[opensuse-packaging] Fwd: Status of SUSE Package Conventions
Hello, I'm wondering what is the status of SPC. Which is the latest revision? On the page [*] I have 2 links on pdf version (rev 1.0) and html version (rev 1.1), the last contains only Part 1, that seems odd to me. [*] http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/SUSE_Package_Conventions -- Regards, Nikolay Derkach
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Nikolay Derkach <nderkach@gmail.com> wrote:-
Hello,
I'm wondering what is the status of SPC. Which is the latest revision?
I'd guess that it's rev 1.1, or hope so since that's the one I use as a reference.
On the page [*] I have 2 links on pdf version (rev 1.0) and html version (rev 1.1), the last contains only Part 1, that seems odd to me.
That's because, for some reason, they split the HTML version and the server only sends you the first part.
[*] http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/SUSE_Package_Conventions
Try going through: URL:http://en.opensuse.org/Documentation Almost at the bottom, in the bit about developer documentation, there's a link to rev 1.1 in PDF format. Regards, David Bolt -- Member of Team Acorn checking nodes at 50 Mnodes/s: http://www.distributed.net/ RISCOS 3.11 | SUSE 10.0 32bit | SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit RISCOS 3.6 | SUSE 10.0 64bit | SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit TOS 4.02 | SUSE 9.3 32bit | | openSUSE 10.3a2 32bit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
В сообщении от 16 апреля 2007 David Bolt написал(a):
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Nikolay Derkach <nderkach@gmail.com> wrote:-
Hello,
I'm wondering what is the status of SPC. Which is the latest revision?
I'd guess that it's rev 1.1, or hope so since that's the one I use as a reference.
On the page [*] I have 2 links on pdf version (rev 1.0) and html version (rev 1.1), the last contains only Part 1, that seems odd to me.
That's because, for some reason, they split the HTML version and the server only sends you the first part.
[*] http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/SUSE_Package_Conventions
Try going through:
URL:http://en.opensuse.org/Documentation
Almost at the bottom, in the bit about developer documentation, there's a link to rev 1.1 in PDF format.
Regards, David Bolt
Thanks for your reply, David. Are you refering to [*]? [*] http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Special:File/spc/spc.pdf Well, that one has revision 1.0. Could you please give me more precise link? -- Regards, Nikolay Derkach
Thanks for your reply, David. Are you refering to [*]?
[*] http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Special:File/spc/spc.pdf
Well, that one has revision 1.0. Could you please give me more precise link?
Sorry, I confused it with another one. This link is indeed correct, i has rev 1.1 -- Regards, Nikolay Derkach
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nikolay Derkach wrote:
Thanks for your reply, David. Are you refering to [*]? [*] http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Special:File/spc/spc.pdf
Would still be quite useful to have it online (read: as HTML) again. Or maybe in a form where people can add comments, hints, additional information. cheers - -- -o) Pascal Bleser http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ /\ <pascal.bleser@skynet.be> <guru@unixtech.be> __v The more things change, the more they stay insane. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGI+bNr3NMWliFcXcRAoyrAKCQWXTJPQiwrICHqa9TuRpfTSMFpgCgtv+H kXGmY0St7Q8aLkIomWzMwRM= =Zfy2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Pascal Bleser <pascal.bleser@skynet.be> wrote:-
Nikolay Derkach wrote:
Thanks for your reply, David. Are you refering to [*]? [*] http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Special:File/spc/spc.pdf
Would still be quite useful to have it online (read: as HTML) again. Or maybe in a form where people can add comments, hints, additional information.
Well, as a temporary measure, I've copied the entire thing onto my server[0] here: URL:http://www.davjam.org/mediawiki/index.php/openSUSE:Packageconventions I'll have to think about where would be a suitable location for it under opensuse.org, at which point it can move to their servers. [0] don't expect it to be a speed-demon. It's located at the end of a DSL connection with only 400Kbps up. Regards, David Bolt -- Member of Team Acorn checking nodes at 50 Mnodes/s: http://www.distributed.net/ RISCOS 3.11 | SUSE 10.0 32bit | SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit RISCOS 3.6 | SUSE 10.0 64bit | SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit TOS 4.02 | SUSE 9.3 32bit | | openSUSE 10.3a2 32bit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
URL:http://www.davjam.org/mediawiki/index.php/openSUSE:Packageconventions
I'll have to think about where would be a suitable location for it under opensuse.org, at which point it can move to their servers.
In fact, there is a direct link at openSUSE wiki, at the place I thought most suitable: http://en.opensuse.org/Documentation#Developer_Documentation I prefer to have it done this way, the version on Novell's site is regularly updated from SVN. And at the same repository lies HTML version also - it would be good enough to link it directly from the wiki I think, I just did not know that someone would like to have a HTML version. Here is a link to all the files: http://forgeftp.novell.com//library/SUSE%20Package%20Conventions/
Would still be quite useful to have it online (read: as HTML) again.
Or maybe in a form where people can add comments, hints, additional information.
Well, I also do not think this is a good idea. SPC is a part of much larger documented maintained in SUSE (I am its maintainer) and it does not make sense to make a version different from an upstream version. I will gladly incorporate any information, hints or comennts someone sends me - it would make sense to create a wiki page with instructions how to contribute to SPC. Anicka -- Best Regards, Anna Bernathova, software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: anicka@suse.cz Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 2 9654 2375 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 8309 5374 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Anicka Bernathova <anicka@suse.cz> wrote:-
URL:http://www.davjam.org/mediawiki/index.php/openSUSE:Packageconventions
I'll have to think about where would be a suitable location for it under opensuse.org, at which point it can move to their servers.
In fact, there is a direct link at openSUSE wiki, at the place I thought most suitable: http://en.opensuse.org/Documentation#Developer_Documentation
Which points to the PDF version, not an online version.
I prefer to have it done this way, the version on Novell's site is regularly updated from SVN. And at the same repository lies HTML version also - it would be good enough to link it directly from the wiki I think, I just did not know that someone would like to have a HTML version. Here is a link to all the files: http://forgeftp.novell.com//library/SUSE%20Package%20Conventions/
That's a useful link but there's a missing file, namely one describing the RPM package style which is part one of the PDF. Also, while the other pages are available to view online, once you find them, the spc.html file isn't. Trying to view it online results in the page being offered for download.
Would still be quite useful to have it online (read: as HTML) again.
Or maybe in a form where people can add comments, hints, additional information.
Well, I also do not think this is a good idea. SPC is a part of much larger documented maintained in SUSE (I am its maintainer) and it does not make sense to make a version different from an upstream version.
I can see a good point for allowing comments and hints, and even other additional information, provided that these additions are marked as such.
I will gladly incorporate any information, hints or comennts someone sends me - it would make sense to create a wiki page with instructions how to contribute to SPC.
That's also a good idea. Link to the main pages on forgeftp.novell.com and have the wiki pages almost like a discussion page, or a forum[0]. There's also the possibility of holding the discussions about bits of the guidelines on this list. [0] Are there actually any plans to create an openSUSE web forum? Regards, David Bolt -- Member of Team Acorn checking nodes at 50 Mnodes/s: http://www.distributed.net/ RISCOS 3.11 | SUSE 10.0 32bit | SUSE 10.1 32bit | openSUSE 10.2 32bit RISCOS 3.6 | SUSE 10.0 64bit | SUSE 10.1 64bit | openSUSE 10.2 64bit TOS 4.02 | SUSE 9.3 32bit | | openSUSE 10.3a2 32bit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Anicka Bernathova -
David Bolt -
Nikolay Derkach -
Pascal Bleser