On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Michael Matz wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
A git repo of all that would take up similar amounts of space, perhaps some few gigs less (because of compressing and delta-packing the text files). I wouldn't want to have that local ;)
It is obviously complete madness to suggest that there would be a single repo for everything. ;-)
Wenn schon denn schon, as the germans say. And realistic if you exclude the tarballs.
You can just include upstream source URLs, maybe with MD5 sum.