Hello, on Mittwoch, 2. Februar 2011, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 23:19:40 Christian Boltz wrote:
So if I put in something like
---------------------------------- (c) Christian Boltz 2010-2011
This spec file is licensed under GPL 2 or later.
Only if you've read and follow the GPLv2 - and I doubt you want it for spec files if you've read it.
Hmmm, now it becomes funny ;-) The default SUSE specfile header says "the same license as for the pristine package itself" - so actually a large portion of the spec files in openSUSE _are_ already GPL-licensed (on my system rpm -qa gives me about 30% "GPL v2+"). And now you tell me GPL isn't a good / recommended license for specfiles? ;-) (That said: it's been a while since I read the GPL - which detail are you talking about?) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Bin so kurz davor, den Rechner am MausKabel aus dem Fenster zu hängen und ihm ein letztes drohendes "BOOTE!" an den Kopf zu werfen. Aber ich glaub, das zieht nicht - bin nur im Erdgeschoß ;) [Anatol Schirmer in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org