On Tuesday 2013-11-26 10:08, Michal Vyskocil wrote:
I would like to point to quite common anti-pattern when packaging shared libraries. It is great that most of people are aware about our Shared Library Policy[1]. However it is written in some confusing way, where some people (and I made it as well) think it mandate the name of **source** package.
The omission of a statement "this applies to a subpackage, not the source package" produces a certain ambiguity (and that should be fixed - thanks that you take the time), but other than that, is it really "confusing"?