On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:02:15 +0200 Sascha Peilicke email@example.com wrote:
On 04/22/2013 05:24 PM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
I've just accepted one request and declined the other.
And I would like to discuss following thing: why do you name -src packages as -devel? Is there strong underlying reason to do that? I am not insist on -src at all, but It may lead to misconception, because you do not need src/*.erl files to develop application that uses function from this module.
We also have some packages installing header files into -src / -devel. Maybe we should just not create those sub-packages at all?
What I get from the documentation Matwey linked to, header files should go to the main package. I suggest we package src/ into a -src package, and drop -devel.
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Peter/Erlang_Packaging_Guidelines says: "Header files for erlang modules must be bundled with main package (not in *-devel). They are very often used by system administrators right from the REPL console."