On Oct 19, 13 00:07:01 +0400, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
Hi,
In CrossToolchain:avr, I see avr-gcc-* and cross-avr-gcc. What is the difference? What is correct naming? (I suppose the last one).
We wanted to get rid of the 'cross-' prefix at some point. I personally do not care so much about naming, and did not check if this move was ever completed. Probably not.
The original compiler package that I bootstrapped there was cross-avr-gcc version 4.3.3 but newer compilers come from the package avr-gcc-master and are named avr-gcc-436, avr-gcc-453, avr-gcc-462, avr-gcc-47-20111105 -
Why we just don't have cross-avr-gcc48.spec in devel:gcc gcc48 like every other arch does? It is interesting that Factory supplies cross-avr-binutils but not cross-avr-gcc. May I try to push avr-support to devel:gcc?
I once pulled all the cross-avr toolchain from Factory as it was quite broken. (cross-avr-binutils somehow survived in Factory). We then created several packages in CrossToolchain:avr, but none of them got ever submitted to Factory. Devel:gcc would make a lot of sense, if we go with mainstream gcc. Several years back, I had issues with miscompiled switch statements code size increasements. I'd recommend to double checks these again with gcc-4.8 -- it is definitly worth a try withing devel:gcc cheers, JW- -- o \ Juergen Weigert paint it green! __/ _=======.=======_ <V> | jw@suse.de back to ascii! __/ _---|____________\/ \ | 0911 74053-508 say #263A!__/ (____/ /\ (/) | _____________________________/ _/ \_ vim:set sw=2 wm=8 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, J.Guild, F.Imendoerffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg), Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany SuSE. Supporting Linux since 1992. ☺ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org