September 2011 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

Re: [opensuse-packaging] How often should I update factory?
by Milisav Radmanic 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Am Dienstag, 6. September 2011, 11:01:43 schrieb Manu Gupta: > Hi > > How often should I update my factory repo? > > Also, what difference does it make to have a license as GPL v3 vs GPLv3+ The difference is that with the "+"-sign room for interpretation is opened up. The plus sign can be read as being just a part of the version name, but also in the meaning of "v3 and any later". Since nobody knows the license conditions of a GPL that is yet-to-come it might not be the best to leave it open to this interpretation. regards Milisav -- Milisav Radmanic Engineering Manager Server Technologies SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Dropping old failures
by Stephan Kulow 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Hi, There are various packages that fail for >100 days and I'm going to drop them now. I can understand that not everyone can fix his package every week, but 100 days is a reasonable expectation. You can find the list when looking at openSUSE:Factory's project status - http://is.gd/OJ1xK8 Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

5 5

[opensuse-packaging] scala packages
by Denny Beyer 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

Dear all, I'm preparing the updated Scala packages at the moment. Two questions I would like to throw in and would like to get some feedback. 1. Where is a good place to keep and publish scala packages? It used to be in contrib up until now. I could imagine to have in parallel to java a scala directory with scala plus additional packages. It could also live in the java repo. 2. There are now two maintained stable scala versions: 2.8.x and the 2.9.x series. Should both be made available and what would be a good naming scheme for the packages? 3. Is anybody using the packages at all? I never received any requests/bug reports. cheers, Denny -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] linux-g++ scope is skipped by qmake
by Michal Vyskocil 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

Hi all, because of the last change in linker, Publishing/gle-graphics don't build because of the missing -ldl definition in linker. I went through makefiles and realized the problematic Makefile is generated using qmake from qgle.pro file, however it contains following definition linux-g++ { LIBS += -ldl } From my understanding of qmake: Project Files [1] this should be enabled in linux-g++ target. On the other hand qmake -d shows me the test fails, so this section is skipped. Can anyone tell me how to fix that in way, that will be upstreamable? I changed it to unix, but I am not sure that patch will be accepted. [1] http://doc.qt.nokia.com/latest/qmake-project-files.html Regards Michal Vyskocil

1 0