On 2014-08-21 15:32, Jiri Slaby wrote:

On 08/21/2014, 12:57 PM, Max Lin wrote:

...

Hi,

Can someone enable build with Factory repo. in Kernel:stable? otherwise the submission from Kernel:stable would not pass check by factory-repochecker, ie. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/245242

Hi, there is a little point in building the kernel for multiple repositories.

Agreed.

Leaving for discussion, if we should switch to building against factory (more frequent kernel rebuilds)

The Kernel:* projects' repositories have rebuild="local" block="local" in the configuration, so they only rebuild when a new kernel is uploaded. An exception is the QA repository, but that one only builds kernel-obs-qa, which doesn't take long. So this is not such a big deal. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org

At Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:32:20 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:

On 08/21/2014, 12:57 PM, Max Lin wrote:

...

Hi,

Can someone enable build with Factory repo. in Kernel:stable? otherwise the submission from Kernel:stable would not pass check by factory-repochecker, ie. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/245242

Hi, there is a little point in building the kernel for multiple repositories. Leaving for discussion, if we should switch to building against factory (more frequent kernel rebuilds) or add a special staging project with factory repo in it...

How about just adding factory repo but not publishing it? Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org

At Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:51:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:

Takashi Iwai writes:

...

How about just adding factory repo but not publishing it?

What's wrong with publishing it?

People may get confused which repo to use. (Don't ask why people get confused. Experience says that normal human beings get confused when there is more than one thing.) Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org

On 25.08.2014 10:31, Andreas Schwab wrote:

Takashi Iwai writes:

...

At Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:51:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:

...

Takashi Iwai writes:

...

How about just adding factory repo but not publishing it?

What's wrong with publishing it?

People may get confused which repo to use.

That will not add significantly to the confusion.

Not to bright minds like you - but if you follow e.g. KDE mailing lists you will find quickly that no matter how clearly you document it or how much effort you put in finding good names - there are always people confused. And having a 2nd repo doesn't even add any value IMO - we want only one repo and we want factory, so where is the problem? Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org

On 25.08.2014 13:50, Takashi Iwai wrote:

At Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:40:23 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:

...

On 25.08.2014 10:31, Andreas Schwab wrote:

...

Takashi Iwai writes:

...

At Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:51:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:

...

Takashi Iwai writes:

...

How about just adding factory repo but not publishing it?

What's wrong with publishing it?

People may get confused which repo to use.

That will not add significantly to the confusion.

Not to bright minds like you - but if you follow e.g. KDE mailing lists you will find quickly that no matter how clearly you document it or how much effort you put in finding good names - there are always people confused.

And having a 2nd repo doesn't even add any value IMO - we want only one repo and we want factory, so where is the problem?

The Kernel:stable repo has been (and is) for openSUSE 13.1-based systems, including Tumbleweed. Building only with FACTORY brings a slight danger of breakage on such systems. That's the major concern for switching, AFAIK.

If that danger exists, the theory that Kernel: projects only need one repo is doomed. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org

Am 27.08.2014 15:54, schrieb Michal Marek:

BTW, Jiri did the switch yesterday. So far, everything has been green or blue.

Unfortunately all ARM repositories have disappeared now. No PowerPC either. Could you please look into that? Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org

Stephan Kulow writes:

On 25.08.2014 10:31, Andreas Schwab wrote:

...

Takashi Iwai writes:

...

At Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:51:25 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:

...

Takashi Iwai writes:

...

How about just adding factory repo but not publishing it?

What's wrong with publishing it?

People may get confused which repo to use.

That will not add significantly to the confusion.

Not to bright minds like you - but if you follow e.g. KDE mailing lists you will find quickly that no matter how clearly you document it or how much effort you put in finding good names - there are always people confused.

Which exactly proves my point. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org