Hi,
I typically manage my setups with yum, where I'm still on openSUSE 10.2, but
one thing is really disturbing:
Transaction Check Error:
file /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-bigsmp/modules.alias conflicts between attempted
installs of kernel-bigsmp-2.6.18.8-0.8 and kernel-syms-2.6.18.8-0.8
which isn't a big surprise, since:
> rpm -qvlp i586/kernel-bigsmp-2.6.18.8-0.8.i586.rpm | grep modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 307579 Jan 21 17:36 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-bigsmp/modules.alias
> rpm -qvlp i586/kernel-syms-2.6.18.8-0.8.i586.rpm | grep modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 307579 Jan 21 17:52 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-bigsmp/modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 308322 Jan 21 17:52 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-debug/modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 306176 Jan 21 17:52 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-default/modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 306441 Jan 21 17:53 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-kdump/modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4086 Jan 21 17:53 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-um/modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 296385 Jan 21 17:53 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-vanilla/modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 290340 Jan 21 17:53 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-xen/modules.alias
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 290259 Jan 21 17:53 /lib/modules/2.6.18.8-0.8-xenpae/modules.alias
Aren't these packages supposed to be installed together?
Pete
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help(a)opensuse.org
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:55:00PM +0100, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> Greg,
>
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:10:07PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Kurt Garloff:
> > Why isn't this one upstream? It's been in our tree for ages, which
> > tends to make me think it's no longer needed for us?
> > patches.suse/scsi-error-test-unit-ready-timeout
>
> I sent it once (a looooong time ago), probably should send it again.
> It did fix a real problem.
That would be great. Or do you want me to push it with the others in
this series I'm going to try to get there?
> > We should be able to drop this now:
> > patches.suse/setuid-dumpable-wrongdir
>
> Upstream got it wrong and set a wrong de-facto standard :-(
>
> As we had it right in SLES9, this patch keeps us compatible
> with SLES9. We're also compatible with mainline: The file
> exists twice :-( That's a PITA as well, but the smallest of
> all evils I believe.
Ok, we're stuck with this for forever then? Ugh, no fun...
> > No more maintainer, or no valid "Signed-off-by:" from a Novell developer:
> > I'm going to drop these, unless someone really feels that they should
> > be in our kernel tree. If so, please let me know by the end of the
> > week. Maybe I should just throw them at lkml, as we are using them
> > for some reason. If they don't stick, they should probably be
> > gone...
> > patches.fixes/bridge-module-get-put.patch
>
> Jan Beulich owns it
>
> > patches.fixes/do_anonymous_page-race
>
>
> > patches.fixes/grab-swap-token-oops
>
> Hmmm, if this is real, then it should go upstream/
>
> > patches.fixes/ieee1394-sbp2_long_sysfs_ieee1394_id.patch
> > patches.fixes/ipv6-no-autoconf
> > patches.fixes/oom-warning
>
> This saved real support load.
>
> > patches.fixes/parport-mutex
> > patches.fixes/remount-no-shrink-dcache
>
> Should go upstream IMHO
>
> > patches.fixes/seccomp-disable-tsc-option
> > patches.fixes/tiocgdev
>
> Our boot logging daemon (blogd) needs it and this SUSE patch exists
> since the last century or so (!). Werner submitted it numerous times
> but some people were arguing that you could achieve similar things
> without the patch. I think Werner has not treid for a few years now ...
> Please talk to Werner Fink.
Will do.
> > patches.fixes/tulip-quad-NIC-ifdown
> > patches.suse/connector-read-mostly
> > patches.suse/crasher-26.diff
> > patches.suse/filp-slab-rcu
> > patches.suse/lockd-max-hosts-dynamic (and other lockd stuff,
> > should all be dropped I
> > feel, as we don't have
> > anyone who cares about
> > it anymore here...)
>
> I would suggest that Neil Brown reviews them and decides on dropping vs
> submission.
>
> > patches.suse/netfilter-ipt_LOG-mac
> > patches.suse/sysctl-add-affinity_load_balancing
>
> Could be a real significant performance tweak.
> I suggest Andi looks at it.
>
> > patches.suse/twofish-2.6 (We gotta be able to drop this one
> > now, right? If not, why isn't it
> > upstream?)
> > patches.suse/unmap_vmas-lat
>
> As we have a real RT kernel, we can drop this one.
I'll do that.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help(a)opensuse.org
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:34:52AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > Are these upstream for 2.6.25?:
> > patches.drivers/libata-add-waits-for-govault
>
> This one we need to keep for now.
>
> > patches.drivers/libata-force-cable-type
>
> This should be replaced by libata-implement-force-parameter which is
> acked. Dunno whether it will make 25 or 26. Will update HEAD. (it's
> still HEAD right?)
Yes, it's still HEAD :)
> > patches.drivers/libata-sata_nv-disable-ADMA
>
> This one we need to keep for now. ADMA still has quite a few issues and
> I don't see them being resolved soon. Upstream might disable ADMA by
> default for 2.6.25 if solutions don't come up soon.
>
> > patches.drivers/libata-unlock-hpa-by-default
>
> Upstream will never change this behavior. We'll just have to keep this
> around.
>
> > patches.drivers/scsi-throttle-SG_DXFER_TO_FROM_DEV-warning-better
>
> Please keep this for now. I'll forward it upstream.
Thanks for the descriptions,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help(a)opensuse.org
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:35:51PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday February 6, sjayaraman(a)suse.de wrote:
> >
> > Some of these patches were done by Olaf for adding in-kernel statd
> > support during SLES 10 and I think these patches are no longer required
> > for 11.0 as we decided to go with userspace statd. However, Neil would
> > be able to confirm.
> >
> > Neil: Do we still need any of these patches?
> >
> > Tag: HEAD
> > Log:
> > - remove unused lockd patches:
> > - patches.suse/lockd-switchable-statd
> > - patches.suse/lockd-kernel-statd
> > - patches.suse/lockd-suse-config
>
> These 3 we definitely don't want.
>
> > - patches.suse/lockd-max-hosts-dynamic
>
> This one we probably don't want, but it might be nice to fix the
> problem in a better way.
Great, they're all dropped now.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help(a)opensuse.org
Hi,
does anybody object to setting CONFIG_USB_DEBUG in the default
config of the debug kernels?
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help(a)opensuse.org
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:40:17AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh(a)suse.de> writes:
>
> > patches.suse/suse-ppc32-mol-BIT
> > patches.suse/suse-ppc32-mol-get-property
> > patches.suse/suse-ppc32-mol-handle-mm-fault
> > patches.suse/suse-ppc32-mol-ioctl
> > patches.suse/suse-ppc32-mol-kbuild.patch
> > patches.suse/suse-ppc32-mol-sheep
> > patches.suse/suse-ppc32-mol.patch
>
> Required for MOL.
What is "MOL"? Mac on Linux?
And if it's required, why are these patches not upstream?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help(a)opensuse.org