(In reply to Bit Juggler from comment #30) > In comment #4 i confirmed that i had the same problem as discussed in this > bug report and that the proposed solution/workaround did help me to > successfully get back to a proper functioning system. Ah, so in that case I misunderstood that comment. > So if this was just some unwanted "me-too"-story i beg to accept my apology. No, I truly apologize you.