Comment # 12 on bug 1193139 from Tom de Vries

(In reply to Michal Hocko from comment #11)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Michal Hocko from comment #9)
> > > Is this particular failure a regression or something that has only really
> > > worked by a chance? Maybe we just haven't run this particular test before?
> > > 
> > 
> > We did run the tests before, and it started failing only recently, so in
> > that sense it's a regression.
> 
> Were those tests compiling for 32b as well?

Yes.

> Or is this part possibly new?

No.