On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Raymond Wooninck
On Friday, July 20, 2012 20:16:04 todd rme wrote:
I noticed that the KDE package sources do not have the full URL to the download. Is there a reason for this or should I add it?
Also, can I remove the xz buildrequires now? Neither KDF nor KR49 need it anymore.
Someone said not to build against openSUSE 11.4, since it is eol soon. Are we never going to build these packages against openSUSE 11.4, and if so can I remove the build checks for it? Hi Todd,
I wouldn't remove openSUSE 11.4 support right now. People running 11.4, might still want to install KDE 4.9 :-)
Sven Burmeister said not to (due to the impending eol), that is why I am asking.
The builldrequires for xz was required as that the sources in KDF were packaged with xz. This would deliver a smaller tarball. If you create packages with bzip2, then the xz buildrequire is indeed not required.
KDF, KR48, and KR49 all have "Support: xz" in their project config, so if I understand it correctly all packages in those repos will get xz whether it is a buildrequires or not. So having it as a buildrequires is redundant. That is why I am asking if I can remove it.
I noticed that you are submitting libraries already to KDF. For libQtModemManager and libQtNetworkManager, please update the tarball to the latest version in git (at least if you are planning to deliver also the latest version of the networkmanagement plasmoid).
Should I use the git version of networkmanager, or should I just stick to the stable version? Networkmanager releases are not synced to KDE SC releases, so that may be outside the scope of this.
Thanks for your help.
Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org