On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:42, J. Daniel Schmidt
Given the current timeline that we have to become independent of Microfocus I am asking all of you to postpone this discussion to at least after May 18th - maybe even to June. Currently we just don't have the time or resources for such a discussion not even for any technical changes.
We tried to contact you twice before about this via email, and even before this on progress-o-o opensuse-admin project and the lack of communication there was the main reason why we didn't even bother thinking about SUSE's system, and worked out our own. If this is how we are going to work this out, I would prefer to switch over now, since you already answered, and not in a few months when I will be waiting for any communication again.
I heard rumors that the missing feature might be "openid" and UCS only provides "openid connect". Yes thats true. In our original schedule we would have had more time to address such issues. Right now I asked Bernhard Wiedemann (CCed) to look into this topic. He is planning to provide openid with UCS in the backend. I think he will even accept helping hands. This solution might just be a quick workaround for some time, yes. But I hope that we can find volunteer that will look into packaging a solid solution that can be installed via the UCS app store natively. Then we will happily switch to this solution.
This seems like a massive omission on your part, since both internal and external openQA relies on OpenID (and for openSUSE Weblate and Jenkins). I seriously cannot fathom you didn't actually look at the infrastructure and think about what service requires what IDP. What were the criteria then? Not to mention, I noted this as a requirement in the opensuse-admin ticket where we were trying you to answer questions about the account system too. No needs of openSUSE were ever considered, and it's depressing. LCP [Stasiek] https://lcp.world -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: heroes+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: heroes+owner@opensuse.org