Hi,
what is the status of the gwibber/pino online (any other twitter clients needing update as well) for all current distributions? With twitters switch off of basic authentication, an update is needed...
Andreas
On Friday 10 September 2010 10:14:03 Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Hi,
what is the status of the gwibber/pino online (any other twitter clients needing update as well) for all current distributions? With twitters switch off of basic authentication, an update is needed...
tracked in: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636217
but not released yet, Andreas
Le vendredi 10 septembre 2010, à 10:55 +0200, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Friday 10 September 2010 10:14:03 Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Hi,
what is the status of the gwibber/pino online (any other twitter clients needing update as well) for all current distributions? With twitters switch off of basic authentication, an update is needed...
tracked in: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636217
This is for choqok, not gwibber :-)
James, you were working on that?
Vincent
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 10:58 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 10 septembre 2010, à 10:55 +0200, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Friday 10 September 2010 10:14:03 Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Hi,
what is the status of the gwibber/pino online (any other twitter clients needing update as well) for all current distributions? With twitters switch off of basic authentication, an update is needed...
tracked in: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636217
This is for choqok, not gwibber :-)
James, you were working on that?
Vincent
-- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
The gwibber package in GNOME:Apps works a treat for me on 11.3 - which I believe James did. It also fixes several other issues, like notification bubbles and notification icon.
Regards,
Andy
Sex, 2010-09-10 às 10:58 +0200, Vincent Untz escreveu:
Le vendredi 10 septembre 2010, à 10:55 +0200, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Friday 10 September 2010 10:14:03 Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Hi,
what is the status of the gwibber/pino online (any other twitter clients needing update as well) for all current distributions? With twitters switch off of basic authentication, an update is needed...
tracked in: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636217
This is for choqok, not gwibber :-)
Gwibber from G:A works with twitter, pino upstream is working on that[1].
1 - http://code.google.com/p/pino-twitter/issues/detail?id=5
Le vendredi 10 septembre 2010, à 10:16 +0100, Andrew Wafaa a écrit :
The gwibber package in GNOME:Apps works a treat for me on 11.3 - which I believe James did. It also fixes several other issues, like notification bubbles and notification icon.
But can we push it as a maintenance update for 11.3? That's what is really needed here. I'm a bit afraid that it's a new upstream version, from a different branch...
Vincent
what is the status of the gwibber/pino online (any other twitter clients needing update as well) for all current distributions? With twitters switch off of basic authentication, an update is needed...
Gwibber in GNOME:Apps works.
I haven't had time to work on a patch just for this to the 11.3 standard packages.
But can we push it as a maintenance update for 11.3? That's what is really needed here. I'm a bit afraid that it's a new upstream version, from a different branch...
It adds new dependencies not in 11.3 so no, we can't.
The merge that upstream did has two issues:
a) The patch doesn't just apply to Twitter/OAuth, for some reason some other work was done on a branch that was meant to be solely for that work. b) It doesn't apply to the 11.3 package anyway, rendering the whole thing moot.
At the moment, work pressures mean I simply don't have the time to unpick a convoluted patch and manually beat it into shape for the 11.3 packages. If someone else will have a try, I can certainly offer advice and/or testing of packages before they're pushed.
James
On Friday 10 September 2010 18:10:06 James Ogley wrote:
But can we push it as a maintenance update for 11.3? That's what is really needed here. I'm a bit afraid that it's a new upstream version, from a different branch...
It adds new dependencies not in 11.3 so no, we can't.
Why not? We should be able to add those new dependencies into 11.3 as well. What am I missing here?
The merge that upstream did has two issues:
a) The patch doesn't just apply to Twitter/OAuth, for some reason some other work was done on a branch that was meant to be solely for that work. b) It doesn't apply to the 11.3 package anyway, rendering the whole thing moot.
At the moment, work pressures mean I simply don't have the time to unpick a convoluted patch and manually beat it into shape for the 11.3 packages. If someone else will have a try, I can certainly offer advice and/or testing of packages before they're pushed.
Andreas
Le vendredi 10 septembre 2010, à 22:19 +0200, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Friday 10 September 2010 18:10:06 James Ogley wrote:
But can we push it as a maintenance update for 11.3? That's what is really needed here. I'm a bit afraid that it's a new upstream version, from a different branch...
It adds new dependencies not in 11.3 so no, we can't.
Why not? We should be able to add those new dependencies into 11.3 as well. What am I missing here?
Even if the packages are not available for 11.3 today? (Unless people use devel:languages:python)
Vincent
On Friday 10 September 2010 22:36:14 Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 10 septembre 2010, à 22:19 +0200, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
On Friday 10 September 2010 18:10:06 James Ogley wrote:
But can we push it as a maintenance update for 11.3? That's what is really needed here. I'm a bit afraid that it's a new upstream version, from a different branch...
It adds new dependencies not in 11.3 so no, we can't.
Why not? We should be able to add those new dependencies into 11.3 as well. What am I missing here?
Even if the packages are not available for 11.3 today? (Unless people use devel:languages:python)
It should be possible to add them to the update repository. It's not the normal way and therefore might need more discussion but I doubt it's impossible.
Btw. I would first push the packages to openSUSE:Factory,
Andreas
It should be possible to add them to the update repository. It's not the normal way and therefore might need more discussion but I doubt it's impossible. Btw. I would first push the packages to openSUSE:Factory,
If you want to take the version that's currently in GNOME:Apps, the only additional requirement I think is python-markupsafe which has been pushed to oS:F anyway in preparation for 11.4.
Has the GNOME:Apps version been pushed to oS:F?
On 09/16/2010 at 1:37 PM, James Ogley riggwelter@opensuse.org wrote:
It should be possible to add them to the update repository. It's not the normal way and therefore might need more discussion but I doubt it's impossible. Btw. I would first push the packages to openSUSE:Factory,
If you want to take the version that's currently in GNOME:Apps, the only additional requirement I think is python-markupsafe which has been pushed to oS:F anyway in preparation for 11.4.
Has the GNOME:Apps version been pushed to oS:F?
The 'previous version' from G:A (2.31.93) had been pushed and accepted in Factory. Just a few minutes ago I got 2.31.94 submitted, accepted and already pushed again.
That's as good as it can get.
Dominique
-
Andreas Jaeger -
Andrew Wafaa -
Dominique Leuenberger -
James Ogley -
Luis Medinas -
Vincent Untz