Re: [opensuse-gnome] GNOME:Factory / GNOME:Factory:Next / GNOME:Stable / GNOME:Unstable etc etc

On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 08:46 +1100, Magnus Boman wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 18:16 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 07:38 +1100, Magnus Boman wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:12 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:23 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
1. Should we copy all packages from G:F to a GNOME:Stable (I think we have a G:S but don't know the state of it. We might want to start from scratch here) and then update to 2.24.3
might be a good idea, I guess
+1
Ok, so remaining questions are, do we use copypac or links? Using links will put some maintenance burden on the project beyond just having the latest stable GNOME release, since packages will break every now and again when patches are created for 11.1/GNOME components.
yeah, but since patches and changes are being done for 11.1 as we speak, we really need to merge changes at some point, so I think linkpac might be the best, even though it adds extra maintainance work. But I think it's easier than merging by hand all packages when submitting to G:F
Ok, linkpac it is.
Also, is G:S enough, or should we have a sub-project called G:S:2.24? I mean, what will happen once 2.26 is released? Wipe G:C and start over, or, by using subprojects, create G:C:2.26
not sure if we really want to have old GNOME versions lying around, I'd say having STABLE and UNSTABLE should be enough. Once 2.26 is released, it is moved to G:S, and 2.27 lands in G:F:N (or G:U)
Fair enough.
So... I'd really appreciate if someone could simply delete G:S and G:U and re-create them as GNOME:Stable/GNOME:Unstable (Their names are all upper case today which is kind of ugly) and then add me to the project and I'll get going with it.
I went ahead to remove G:S and G:U, and while removing G:S, it complained about G:C:openSUSE10.3+GNOME:STABLE, g:C:openSUSE11.0 +GNOME:STABLE and home:lrupp:openSUSE10.3. This seems plain wrong, given that G:S has half of the packages failing building, but before removing it, better to ask. For G:U, we have the GNOME:snapshots:* projects using it, so will change that as soon as we remove it. So, can we remove those G:C repos? -- Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@novell.com> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org

Le mardi 20 janvier 2009, à 12:02 +0100, Rodrigo Moya a écrit :
I went ahead to remove G:S and G:U, and while removing G:S, it complained about G:C:openSUSE10.3+GNOME:STABLE, g:C:openSUSE11.0 +GNOME:STABLE and home:lrupp:openSUSE10.3. This seems plain wrong, given that G:S has half of the packages failing building, but before removing it, better to ask.
For G:U, we have the GNOME:snapshots:* projects using it, so will change that as soon as we remove it.
So, can we remove those G:C repos?
I vote "yes" :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org

So, can we remove those G:C repos? I vote "yes" :-)
As do I - kill them! :) -- James Ogley, openSUSE Member: GNOME Team and Planet SUSE. riggwelter@opensuse.org http://opensuse.org/GNOME http://planetsuse.org openSUSE: Get It, Discover It, Create It at http://www.opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
James Ogley
-
Rodrigo Moya
-
Vincent Untz