The choice sounds to me a bit arbitrary, considering that Gnomebaker was what the community voted, and as a consequence was introduced in 10.3 beta 2. What are the reasons to change?

1) Brasero is maintained and actively developed; while it is still young, this is very important.

Yes, this is true, but I have doubts about this choice.

2) GnomeBaker is deprecated, unmaintained, and hasn't seen a commit in seven months [2] and a release in nearly a year [3].

Deprecated by whom and why? It is available for 10.2 and on all major distributions.

3) Brasero, while slightly rough around the edges and could benefit from a little polish (but the same can be argued for GnomeBaker) works with the new wodim and related tools, which means it's actually possible to burn discs in Brasero.

I tried to use it on 10.2 some month ago and what I noticed was that it ruined various media. Which is quite strange, being a frontend to the same tools used by others programs.

4) Brasero has decent desktop integration, including support for Beagle, Totem playlists, libnotify, and solid GStreamer support.

Yes. Not that these are the main factors in my opinion, but I already explained this in the discussion about brasero-gnomebaker. It's better to leave GNOME without a burning application, and use nautilus, as done till now, instead of putting a young application as brasero in it. Regards, Alberto -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org