UPD: please ignore that "point" item

2015-09-28 20:38 GMT+03:00 Andrei Dziahel develop7@develop7.info:

Hi list,

TL; DR: latest snapshot basically broke nodejs for me. I am forced to report this bug here because boo replies with 404 on attempt to file it (it shows bug form on /enter_bug.cgi alright, but replies with 404 on post_bug.cgi when I press "Submit").

Steps to reproduce:

• install nodejs v4.0.0 of latest snapshot and nodejs-npm/npm (both fit well)
• point
• run npm install --global babel (any package name works actually)

Expected: named package is installed

Instead: npm (well, nodejs) terminates with SIGSEGV.

Note: nodejs interpreters installed with nvm (https://github.com/creationix/nvm) are not affected by this issue.

Backtrace:

$ gdb /usr/bin/node usr.bin.node.core […skip copyrights…] warning: core file may not match specified executable file. [New LWP 1680] [New LWP 1688] [New LWP 1692] [New LWP 1691] [New LWP 1687] [New LWP 1681] [New LWP 1694] [New LWP 1693] [New LWP 1690] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `npm '. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

...

...

...

bt

#0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () #1 0x0000000000bd6996 in node::crypto::Hash::HashUpdate(v8::FunctionCallbackInfov8::Value const&) () #2 0x00000000006a006b in v8::internal::FunctionCallbackArguments::Call(void (*)(v8::FunctionCallbackInfov8::Value const&)) () #3 0x00000000006cb432 in v8::internal::MaybeHandlev8::internal::Object v8::internal::HandleApiCallHelper<false>(v8::internal::Isolate*, v8::internal::(anonymous namespace)::BuiltinArguments<(v8::internal::BuiltinExtraArguments)1>&) [clone .constprop.66] () #4 0x00000000006cb88e in v8::internal::Builtin_HandleApiCall(int, v8::internal::Object**, v8::internal::Isolate*) () #5 0x00002250cdb060bb in ?? () #6 0x0000098de41db889 in ?? () #7 0x00002250cdb06001 in ?? () #8 0x00007ffd76342d80 in ?? () #9 0x00007ffd76342de0 in ?? () #10 0x00002250cdcfdbe9 in ?? () #11 0x0000098de41db889 in ?? () #12 0x0000201d8da65759 in ?? () #13 0x00002d4fb6522369 in ?? () #14 0x0000246228746689 in ?? () #15 0x0000098de41db889 in ?? () #16 0x0000098de41e70e9 in ?? () #17 0x00002d4fb6530a51 in ?? () #18 0x00007ffd76342e20 in ?? () #19 0x00002250cdb19494 in ?? () #20 0x0000201d8da65759 in ?? () #21 0x00002d4fb6522369 in ?? () #22 0x0000246228746629 in ?? () #23 0x0000000100000000 in ?? () #24 0x0000098de41e70e9 in ?? () #25 0x0000000a00000000 in ?? () #26 0x00007ffd76342e70 in ?? () #27 0x00002250cdcfd59c in ?? () #28 0x00002d4fb6522369 in ?? () #29 0x0000246228746629 in ?? () #30 0x0000098de41e70e9 in ?? () #31 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

...

...

...

If it's my fault that bug can't be properly reported, I kindly ask you to copy&paste this report to BOO for me.

Thank you in advance.