Le lundi 25 juin 2012 à 14:48 +0200, Ludwig Nussel a écrit :

Hi,

openSUSE currently has separate repos for free software according to the free software definition and software that is not free according to that definition (*:NonFree projects in obs). There's only one update repo though that mixes both types of software again.

Question is whether we should clean that up an have two update repos. One for oss and one for non-oss. Advantage of two repos is the clear separation of non-free components of course. You can't accidentally build against non-free stuff then. Disadvantage might be that this would add two more repos to a default installation (the non-oss update repo itself and a separate debuginfo repo).

Any opinions on the matter?

I'd say split update, to make sure non-free stuff doesn't "pollute" free repository. -- Frederic Crozat SUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-25 14:48, Ludwig Nussel wrote:

Any opinions on the matter?

Any possibility of reducing metadata size? - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/oYNQACgkQIvFNjefEBxo3LwCgrZ5KMFJszIhRJt/wSoQBcLG2 6gUAoKGQg+PLvrDIEmTots/P4btp0kbu =dVAl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 25.06.2012 14:48, schrieb Ludwig Nussel:

Hi,

openSUSE currently has separate repos for free software according to the free software definition and software that is not free according to that definition (*:NonFree projects in obs). There's only one update repo though that mixes both types of software again.

Question is whether we should clean that up an have two update repos. One for oss and one for non-oss. Advantage of two repos is the clear separation of non-free components of course. You can't accidentally build against non-free stuff then. Disadvantage might be that this would add two more repos to a default installation (the non-oss update repo itself and a separate debuginfo repo).

Any opinions on the matter?

my opinion: If you do the split, do it for 12.3-MS1 so that we have time to verify that everything works as expected. Ciao Bernhard M. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/pu+AACgkQSTYLOx37oWREEACgj3iI9D5iulgEyj/joap6on2i 9UAAnRSjdUsqGg2RMjibgrOwc9ZIkcjc =Eph3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org

Am 25.06.2012 14:48, schrieb Ludwig Nussel:

Hi,

openSUSE currently has separate repos for free software according to the free software definition and software that is not free according to that definition (*:NonFree projects in obs). There's only one update repo though that mixes both types of software again.

Question is whether we should clean that up an have two update repos. One for oss and one for non-oss. Advantage of two repos is the clear separation of non-free components of course. You can't accidentally build against non-free stuff then. Disadvantage might be that this would add two more repos to a default installation (the non-oss update repo itself and a separate debuginfo repo).

Any opinions on the matter?

Just to keep you informed: Luwdig went forward and we changed it that for 12.2 - so please watch out for problems with it on RC1. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org