Re: [opensuse-factory] Updating and memory..
* M9. <monkey9@iae.nl> [Apr 26. 2007 11:20]:
Klaus Kaempf schreef:
What kind of upgrade ? Can you be more specific ?
Well, i mean the updates, sorry, like the ones from yesterday and today.. (talking about 102 retail!)
So you're running openSuSE 10.2 and opensuse-updater (resp. yast-online-update) ?! Do you have any large (i.e. factory) repositories subscribed ? Klaus --- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Klaus Kaempf schreef:
* M9. <monkey9@iae.nl> [Apr 26. 2007 11:20]:
Klaus Kaempf schreef:
What kind of upgrade ? Can you be more specific ? Well, i mean the updates, sorry, like the ones from yesterday and today.. (talking about 102 retail!)
So you're running openSuSE 10.2 and opensuse-updater (resp. yast-online-update) ?!
Indeed, I do..
Do you have any large (i.e. factory) repositories subscribed ?
As a matter of fact i have.. If you tell me how, or where i can find a file able to copy the sources, i will past them here, if you like.. ;-) (do you by the way know how to get a touchscreen going on 102, 32bits?)
Klaus
---
- -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.18.8-01-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: monkey9@tribal-sfn2 Systeem: openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64) KDE: 3.5.5 "release 45.4" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMLRYX5/X5X6LpDgRAq6nAJoDUy/bvjq4AU5lR5flXme9IA8/vACg4JIN PJ83uOmmRBsHqDLmwgqaVbo= =sIaN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
* M9. <monkey9@iae.nl> [Apr 26. 2007 16:17]:
Do you have any large (i.e. factory) repositories subscribed ?
As a matter of fact i have..
Ok, this explains it. Factory is HUGE and libzypp parses (and loads :-() all of it. We're working on improving this, see http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Refactoring Klaus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Klaus Kaempf schreef:
* M9. <monkey9@iae.nl> [Apr 26. 2007 16:17]:
Factory is HUGE and libzypp parses (and loads :-() all of it.
We're working on improving this, see http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Refactoring
I am aware of that ;-) (but thank you to point it out anyway:-) It is nessesary... But my message was: With 1024MB Ram, the system is fast, and does not use any swap. x86_64 USES AVERAGE, JUST TO FUNCTION: 425MB Ram. To update the system: Reading and installing, it uses an additional 300MB. (average total of around 732MB) This is just the facts, when using KDE. (when using Icewm, this would be at most 256MB, all together. Normal system usage ca. 96MB Ram. (so called system requirements.) I do not have any problem with this, it is just that memory is very expensive, but you only have to buy it once, (when choosing the largest nessesary amount at once..that is..)
Klaus
- -- Have a nice day, M9. Now, is the only time that exists. OS: Linux 2.6.18.8-01-default x86_64 Huidige gebruiker: monkey9@tribal-sfn2 Systeem: openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64) KDE: 3.5.5 "release 45.4" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMOSfX5/X5X6LpDgRAuWZAJ9dIXQzaNa/un0aR6qvvtcrIkbztACdHiP5 vmnkB6Au5U4DFakS0kLbySE= =iUZX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package. I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt an aditude of "is the Kitchen sink in Der, Eh " but when someone writes a nice tool like GnomeBaker use it! I could really vent here but I won't out of respect but............................................... -- James Tremblay Director of Technology Newmarket School District Novell CNE 3\4\5 CLE \ NCE in training. http://en.opensuse.org/education --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:31 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package. I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt an aditude of "is the Kitchen sink in Der, Eh " but when someone writes a nice tool like GnomeBaker use it! I could really vent here but I won't out of respect but...............................................
Sounds pretty reasonable, file a bug and send us the number! We should upgrade to 0.6.1 while we're at it. -JP -- JP Rosevear <jpr@novell.com> Novell, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Thursday 26 April 2007 19:31, you wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:31 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package. I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt an aditude of "is the Kitchen sink in Der, Eh " but when someone writes a nice tool like GnomeBaker use it! I could really vent here but I won't out of respect but...............................................
Sounds pretty reasonable, file a bug and send us the number!
We should upgrade to 0.6.1 while we're at it.
-JP now filed as bug #269051 -- James Tremblay Director of Technology Newmarket School District Novell CNE 3\4\5 CLE \ NCE in training. http://en.opensuse.org/education
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:15 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2007 19:31, you wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:31 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package. I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt an aditude of "is the Kitchen sink in Der, Eh " but when someone writes a nice tool like GnomeBaker use it! I could really vent here but I won't out of respect but...............................................
Sounds pretty reasonable, file a bug and send us the number!
We should upgrade to 0.6.1 while we're at it.
-JP now filed as bug #269051
And pushed to the right people for 10.3... -JP -- JP Rosevear <jpr@novell.com> Novell, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:31 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package.
Sure, we'll take it into consideration. It is much too late for SLED10-SP1 at this point. We'll review GnomeBaker and consider it for SLED 11. Cheers. -Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 03:11, Gary Ekker wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 17:31 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package.
Sure, we'll take it into consideration. It is much too late for SLED10-SP1 at this point. We'll review GnomeBaker and consider it for SLED 11. Better for openSUSE 10.3 - due in late summer ;-) M
Cheers.
-Gary
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
-- Michael Löffler, Product Management Email: michael.loeffler@suse.de Phone: +49 911 74053-376 SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg SUSE® Linux Enterprise 10 Your Linux is ready http://www.novell.com/linux SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nürnberg - AG Nürnberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus Rex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:31:08PM -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package.
Just install and use k3b, which will work just fine under GNOME.
I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt
We strive to use the best from both desktop worlds... So why not use k3b? Ciao, Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Il giorno ven, 27/04/2007 alle 07.55 +0200, Marcus Meissner ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:31:08PM -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package.
Just install and use k3b, which will work just fine under GNOME.
I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt
We strive to use the best from both desktop worlds... So why not use k3b?
Ciao, Marcus
Because using K3B means installing a part of KDE too, and some users just don't want. It's the old and never solved issue which affects SuSE since the night of times. We can't have a KDE installation without GNOME apps or a GNOME installation without KDE apps, with the usual lack of resources, especially considering that in most cases there are equivalent applications in both worlds. It's just a question of looking for them. I admit the situation somewhat improved in 10.1/10.2, but it's quite annoying to read this kind of answers to users who are just asking for a more clean and polished desktop installation. Btw, openSUSE doesn't provide a default bit-torrent client for GNOME too, while there are many nice and working out there like deluge (quite similar to ktorrent) or trasmission. It would be a nice addition for 10.3. At the moment they're only available through additional unsupported repositories. Regards, Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:10:13AM +0200, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
Il giorno ven, 27/04/2007 alle 07.55 +0200, Marcus Meissner ha scritto:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:31:08PM -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
Dear Gnome and Nautilus Team leaders, would it be all that difficult to change the default gnome installation to carry GnomeBaker with it? it's insultive to the end user not to have simple md5sum checking or even have the ability to tell it to write at best possible speed then verify. Which is completely possible under KDE with K3b which is a default package.
Just install and use k3b, which will work just fine under GNOME.
I use KDE on My Laptop, but my office is all Novell SLED and I am trying not to have to convert Novell networking and other documentation from Gnome to KDE so I use the Gnome there, If Novell is going to support both desktop's why are they not feature to feature equal ? I'm not suggesting that you adopt
We strive to use the best from both desktop worlds... So why not use k3b?
Ciao, Marcus
Because using K3B means installing a part of KDE too, and some users just don't want. It's the old and never solved issue which affects SuSE since the night of times. We can't have a KDE installation without GNOME apps or a GNOME installation without KDE apps, with the usual lack of resources, especially considering that in most cases there are equivalent applications in both worlds. It's just a question of looking for them.
I admit the situation somewhat improved in 10.1/10.2, but it's quite annoying to read this kind of answers to users who are just asking for a more clean and polished desktop installation.
This is just unnecessary purism. Why do you think both cannot coexist, if just for their shared libraries? Ciao, Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
This is just unnecessary purism. Why do you think both cannot coexist, if just for their shared libraries?
Ciao, Marcus
I don't think they can't coexist. I think the user should choose what to install, considering both desktop environments have equivalent applications for basic desktop usage. KDE apps in GNOME (and viceversa), even if themed, are not well integrated and give the impression of an inconsistent environment and user experience. Moreover both DE apps have the bad habit to install a lot of other things which make the menu fuller without a real reason. Regards, Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
I don't think they can't coexist. I think the user should choose what to install, considering both desktop environments have equivalent applications for basic desktop usage.
KDE apps in GNOME (and viceversa), even if themed, are not well integrated and give the impression of an inconsistent environment and user experience.
Moreover both DE apps have the bad habit to install a lot of other things which make the menu fuller without a real reason.
I totally agree with Alberto. Specially because kde apps doesn't fit gnome styles. Regards. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 06:41, Gabriel . wrote:
I don't think they can't coexist. I think the user should choose what to install, considering both desktop environments have equivalent applications for basic desktop usage.
KDE apps in GNOME (and viceversa), even if themed, are not well integrated and give the impression of an inconsistent environment and user experience.
Moreover both DE apps have the bad habit to install a lot of other things which make the menu fuller without a real reason.
I totally agree with Alberto. Specially because kde apps doesn't fit gnome styles.
Hi Gabriel, What is doing a job, style or program functions? If you like good looking style than Window Maker can be customized to look very cool, but it is missing a lot of functionality that are offered by other 2. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 04:25, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
This is just unnecessary purism. Why do you think both cannot coexist, if just for their shared libraries?
Ciao, Marcus
I don't think they can't coexist. I think the user should choose what to install, considering both desktop environments have equivalent applications for basic desktop usage.
KDE apps in GNOME (and viceversa), even if themed, are not well integrated and give the impression of an inconsistent environment and user experience.
Moreover both DE apps have the bad habit to install a lot of other things which make the menu fuller without a real reason.
Regards,
Hi Alberto, I have feeling that Ubuntu/Kubuntu way would be solution that you are looking for, but taking that some applications in both desktop environments are mature while counterpart is far from that, making graphic style or size of system priority will affect functionality. Last time I compared distros it was Red Hat 9 vs. SUSE 9. The only thing Red Hat got better is graphic appearance. SUSE 9 got better hardware recognition, more programs and more programs that have no missing functionality. I got in both distros file managers, but Konqueror was by far better than Nautilus. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Marcus, thank you for responding, however your approach brings us closer to acting like we want openSUSE to be bloatware. let me explain, in order to run any of the programs written to run under KDE we need to add KDEbase3 and all its trappings. put when we use the default configuration of Gnome it, as far as I remember, does not include any of the KDE specific underpinnings. I would like to keep it that way , I like the idea that openSUSE has been working towards a light default install and in the end I hope that ,with KIWI, we will be able to tell the disc mastering team to give us two disk1's each capable of building a run level5 environment ...you choose when you download d1gnome_10.x or d1kde_10.x . each running a nice little productivity environment ( the classic 5 apps) without user intervention at installation. Again thank you for all your work in general and your concern in this matter. -- James Tremblay Director of Technology Newmarket School District Novell CNE 3\4\5 CLE \ NCE in training. http://en.opensuse.org/education --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On 27-04-2007 at 15:30, James Tremblay <jamesat@comcast.net> wrote: d1gnome_10.x or d1kde_10.x . each running a nice little productivity
environment ( the classic 5 apps) without user intervention at installation. Again thank you for all your work in general and your concern in this
matter.
I'm not sure a d1{gnome,kde}-*.iso is what I'd like to see in openSUSE. I have openSUSE installed on more than one computer, more than one user is also working on them. And by far not all of them like gnome/kde/<putwhatever app> Having both environments so close together is a huge advantage! Dominique -- TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 72 offices in 56 countries and over 2,000 professionals (February 2007). TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our unique network and our services and visit our website at www.tmf-group.com. The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the original e-mail communication. TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in its receipt. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 07:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
I'm not sure a d1{gnome,kde}-*.iso is what I'd like to see in openSUSE.
Hi Dominic, I'm sure that I wouldn't like. Presence of both is openSUSE advantage. That is what many describe as more polished and useful. While I can agree with Alberto about graphic part, I don't find it primary concern. On very basic installation either of desktops (DE) doesn't provide maximum functionality. I tried both in basic setting, and there is always something missing. It might be good to analyze software piece by piece, that might benefit discusion to move from opinions to facts, and help both desktops to look better and be more functional. But, who is going to start? We can't get one man to make a list of educational software that should be reviewed, which is smaller task than all of the openSUSE. How to find the one that is going to volunteer for the second? As it is now I'm afraid that we would have problem how to name the project, not to mention how to organize collaboration. The tool is there - openSUSE wiki, we just have to find the way to use it. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 10:00, Rajko M. wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 07:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
I'm not sure a d1{gnome,kde}-*.iso is what I'd like to see in openSUSE.
Hi Dominic,
I'm sure that I wouldn't like.
Presence of both is openSUSE advantage. That is what many describe as more polished and useful.
While I can agree with Alberto about graphic part, I don't find it primary concern.
On very basic installation either of desktops (DE) doesn't provide maximum functionality. I tried both in basic setting, and there is always something missing.
It might be good to analyze software piece by piece, that might benefit discusion to move from opinions to facts, and help both desktops to look better and be more functional.
But, who is going to start? We can't get one man to make a list of educational software that should be reviewed, which is smaller task than all of the openSUSE. How to find the one that is going to volunteer for the second?
As it is now I'm afraid that we would have problem how to name the project, not to mention how to organize collaboration.
The tool is there - openSUSE wiki, we just have to find the way to use it.
Your position on not liking two separate disk 1's understandable, however look at it from the perspective of imaging and maintaining 500 PC's (which i do) my laptops default KDE is 3.8g this is a lot of data to move with a tool like Zenworks imaging or Ghost , while on the other hand my XP image is just under 500m. It takes like 4-6 minutes to set a machine to a default config and I can do an entire school lab of 24 PC's in just a little longer. I like this because it helps make sure each room can get just what it needs. When I deliver apps as add-on images, again using Zenworks, it's much faster and easier to start with a stripped down OS and add bytes rather then run an install routine. I know my 10g hard drives are already obsolete but I'm certainly not the only battling with old hardware. In summary, if I can download a Disk1 that is a nice light productivity desktop and the associated add on media, then I can build a local install repository and have all the extra stuff in there. Now using a tool like Zenworks Snappshot I can add applications , make add-on images and customize each room and user task space with an application delivery system like Naldesk. I believe Novell is in this for the long haul and it's customers aren't the hobbiest or the soho groups normally associated with Linux. If we want openSUSE to survive we MUST think about Novell's Enterprise offerings( which it must sell to have money)and how to best integrate with them and the people that use them. Less is frequently more. -- James Tremblay Director of Technology Newmarket School District Novell CNE 3\4\5 CLE \ NCE in training. http://en.opensuse.org/education --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 10:02, James Tremblay wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 10:00, Rajko M. wrote: ....
It might be good to analyze software piece by piece, that might benefit discusion to move from opinions to facts, and help both desktops to look better and be more functional.
But, who is going to start? We can't get one man to make a list of educational software that should be reviewed, which is smaller task than all of the openSUSE. How to find the one that is going to volunteer for the second?
As it is now I'm afraid that we would have problem how to name the project, not to mention how to organize collaboration.
The tool is there - openSUSE wiki, we just have to find the way to use it.
Your position on not liking two separate disk 1's understandable, however look at it from the perspective of imaging and maintaining 500 PC's (which i do) my laptops default KDE is 3.8g this is a lot of data to move with a tool like Zenworks imaging or Ghost , while on the other hand my XP image is just under 500m.
I can imagine administrator's problems, but limiting functionality would not help. Mentioned RH 9 is 3 CD's (1.8 GB) and I wasn't happy, except with consistency of visual appearance. It was missing or partially implemented functionality that made me to abandon it. Basic openSUSE graphic installation is about 800 MB, but it is pretty useless. Basic KDE, so far I recall is 1.2.GB, and it is useful. Both numbers are bit obsolete, but underlaying reason for the size is open source development where developers use tools that they know, which builds up number of dependencies. I mentioned Ubuntu / Kubuntu, they have one CD images, so it is probably the time to see what they have to offer and compare to SUSE. Last time I wasn't impressed. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 12:15, Rajko M. wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 10:02, James Tremblay wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 10:00, Rajko M. wrote:
....
It might be good to analyze software piece by piece, that might benefit discusion to move from opinions to facts, and help both desktops to look better and be more functional.
But, who is going to start? We can't get one man to make a list of educational software that should be reviewed, which is smaller task than all of the openSUSE. How to find the one that is going to volunteer for the second?
As it is now I'm afraid that we would have problem how to name the project, not to mention how to organize collaboration.
The tool is there - openSUSE wiki, we just have to find the way to use it.
Your position on not liking two separate disk 1's understandable, however look at it from the perspective of imaging and maintaining 500 PC's (which i do) my laptops default KDE is 3.8g this is a lot of data to move with a tool like Zenworks imaging or Ghost , while on the other hand my XP image is just under 500m.
I can imagine administrator's problems, but limiting functionality would not help.
Mentioned RH 9 is 3 CD's (1.8 GB) and I wasn't happy, except with consistency of visual appearance. It was missing or partially implemented functionality that made me to abandon it.
Basic openSUSE graphic installation is about 800 MB, but it is pretty useless. Basic KDE, so far I recall is 1.2.GB, and it is useful. Both numbers are bit obsolete, but underlaying reason for the size is open source development where developers use tools that they know, which builds up number of dependencies.
I mentioned Ubuntu / Kubuntu, they have one CD images, so it is probably the time to see what they have to offer and compare to SUSE. Last time I wasn't impressed. I'm not suggesting that anyone use the first cd as a daily desktop I'm just asking that it get us to a runlevel 5 desktop that will allow further installation of applications from the other disks. YaST can still ask us if we want more during the original installation but if we do nothing we get a bare minimum, such as without OpenOffice which would be no small reduction. A SuSEr once said "SuSE isn't just a distro but an entire set of Linux tools" . I'm only asking that we rearrange the disks to give more choice as to what an when things get installed. -- James Tremblay Director of Technology Newmarket School District Novell CNE 3\4\5 CLE \ NCE in training. http://en.opensuse.org/education
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 13:33, James Tremblay wrote:
I'm not suggesting that anyone use the first cd as a daily desktop I'm just asking that it get us to a runlevel 5 desktop that will allow further installation of applications from the other disks.
I agree. I just wanted to point out that it would not be easy. Some distros have single CD installation, so it is not impossible. I use Knoppix for troubleshooting, and it is filled with quite few applications, also Ubuntu, Kubuntu and few more can be helpful to see what can be done. I installed Kubuntu and I'll see. -- Regards, Rajko. http://en.opensuse.org/Portal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Hi
On Friday 27 April 2007 07:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
I'm not sure a d1{gnome,kde}-*.iso is what I'd like to see in openSUSE.
Thats your point of view - and I agree with you. But as we can see on other distributions, the "overflow" of available applications overburdens the "normal" user. I like that idea of having: - one "mini-CD" for network installation - containing just a base system. - one CD for a default KDE and one CD for a default Gnome-System. For me this seems currently to be the biggest part of work, because of all the dependencies. And I think we should review the current pattern files to see if they contain unneeded applications. - one DVD5 (or DVD9) for the "advanced users" that like the distribution "as is". If a user adds the official openSUSE repository, he can get more applications - and even patterns. ...and if someone likes to help in the buildservice, we can add patterns there, too. On Fr 27 April 2007 16:00 Rajko M. wrote:
It might be good to analyze software piece by piece, that might benefit discusion to move from opinions to facts, and help both desktops to look better and be more functional.
But, who is going to start? We can't get one man to make a list of educational software that should be reviewed, which is smaller task than all of the openSUSE.
BTW: http://software.opensuse.org/download/Education:/desktop/openSUSE_Factory/i5... => the first package containing Desktop patterns is already there. (Please don't install this package, this is just a "meta-Package".) I think we have something like a "chicken or the egg problem" here: without any examples we can't reach the normal user. Without reaching the normal user, we can't get a "cool solution"... ;-)
The tool is there - openSUSE wiki, we just have to find the way to use it.
Yes! Greetings, Lars --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Sunday 29 April 2007 08:15, Lars Rupp wrote:
I think we have something like a "chicken or the egg problem" here: without any examples we can't reach the normal user. Without reaching the normal user, we can't get a "cool solution"... ;-)
Yes, it is. Project probably needs some incentive for active members. The chameleon puppet made miracle with slogan for openSUSE. Do you have few more? -- Regards, Rajko. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
I have feeling that Ubuntu/Kubuntu way would be solution that you are looking for, but taking that some applications in both desktop environments are mature while counterpart is far from that, making graphic style or size of system priority will affect functionality.
I agree, that's the ubuntu way, and that's one of the reasons which make ubuntu so successful: it's just clean, without lacking of the basic functionalities you need. And if you want more, you just open the installer and add, without worrying about the addition of unknown repositories with exotic names, as we have to do. And these, together with the ridiculous delay in solving issues in openSUSE, are the reasons why I'm moving to ubuntu. To be honest, the lack of functionality sounds like an excuse to me. I talked about basic desktop applications, like the one provided by default, so I would like some example of fundamental functionality which would lack adding gnomebaker instead than...nothing, because nothing is installed by default in gnome at the moment to create CD/DVD's, with the exception of the integrated functionalities of Nautilus.
Last time I compared distros it was Red Hat 9 vs. SUSE 9. The only thing Red Hat got better is graphic appearance. SUSE 9 got better hardware recognition, more programs and more programs that have no missing functionality. I got in both distros file managers, but Konqueror was by far better than Nautilus.
The difference is the cleanliness. I don't like Red Hat myself, but without a doubt, its consistency is amazing. The nautilus vs. konqueror battle is just a question of personal preferences. Regards, Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:34:09PM +0200, Alberto Passalacqua wrote:
I have feeling that Ubuntu/Kubuntu way would be solution that you are looking for, but taking that some applications in both desktop environments are mature while counterpart is far from that, making graphic style or size of system priority will affect functionality.
I agree, that's the ubuntu way, and that's one of the reasons which make ubuntu so successful: it's just clean, without lacking of the basic functionalities you need. And if you want more, you just open the installer and add, without worrying about the addition of unknown repositories with exotic names, as we have to do. And these, together with the ridiculous delay in solving issues in openSUSE, are the reasons why I'm moving to ubuntu.
This is just a bit of a strawman I guess.
To be honest, the lack of functionality sounds like an excuse to me. I talked about basic desktop applications, like the one provided by default, so I would like some example of fundamental functionality which would lack adding gnomebaker instead than...nothing, because nothing is installed by default in gnome at the moment to create CD/DVD's, with the exception of the integrated functionalities of Nautilus.
Well and you got a reply that it will be added for 10.3, while I just questioned it a bit why not to use k3b.
Last time I compared distros it was Red Hat 9 vs. SUSE 9. The only thing Red Hat got better is graphic appearance. SUSE 9 got better hardware recognition, more programs and more programs that have no missing functionality. I got in both distros file managers, but Konqueror was by far better than Nautilus.
The difference is the cleanliness. I don't like Red Hat myself, but without a doubt, its consistency is amazing.
"Cleanliness" ... Both KDE and GNOME is OpenSource software. Now if you would discuss cleanliness in regards to having no closed source software on the distribution, I could understand it, but you do seperate KDE and GNOME for no real good reason. Ciao, Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
Il giorno ven, 27/04/2007 alle 14.39 +0200, Marcus Meissner ha scritto:
This is just a bit of a strawman I guess.
You guess wrong, but that's OK. It's some time I'm working at that.
Last time I compared distros it was Red Hat 9 vs. SUSE 9. The only thing Red Hat got better is graphic appearance. SUSE 9 got better hardware recognition, more programs and more programs that have no missing functionality. I got in both distros file managers, but Konqueror was by far better than Nautilus.
The difference is the cleanliness. I don't like Red Hat myself, but without a doubt, its consistency is amazing.
"Cleanliness" ... Both KDE and GNOME is OpenSource software.
Now if you would discuss cleanliness in regards to having no closed source software on the distribution, I could understand it, but you do seperate KDE and GNOME for no real good reason.
I'm not an ideologist, if a closed source application is well done and works, I've no problem to use it or to accept it in the distribution. One of the advantages of SuSE is that you already find flash, acroread and some other applications already on media. Cleanliness, for me, means not seeing inconsistent choices of apps, evidently out of places windows, dialogs, applets and so on. I never said it has to have a higher priority than functionalities, but when there are alternatives there's no reason to do a mix. And for basic functionalities there are various alternatives. Regards, Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Thursday 2007-04-26 at 17:59 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
Ok, this explains it.
Factory is HUGE and libzypp parses (and loads :-() all of it.
We're working on improving this, see http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/Refactoring
A guess. Aplying deltas in my system (P-IV, 1GiB) is very slow and cpu intensive (dunno about memory). Perhaps applying patches could be faster sometimes, or maybe the whole package. Perhaps you could add a tunning control (user accesable) to be able to chose deltas, patches or whole rpm depending on the sizes of each and the network bandwidth, and the available memory? Just an idea. - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFGMTAUtTMYHG2NR9URAmvrAJ9veai2D0lST8LZHPNxTXGX2BBD/QCeNMMX fo3V7Oy4I5ScKQzc4kaliwI= =b62H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
* Carlos E. R. <robin.listas@telefonica.net> [Apr 27. 2007 01:05]:
A guess.
Aplying deltas in my system (P-IV, 1GiB) is very slow and cpu intensive (dunno about memory). Perhaps applying patches could be faster sometimes, or maybe the whole package.
Perhaps you could add a tunning control (user accesable) to be able to chose deltas, patches or whole rpm depending on the sizes of each and the network bandwidth, and the available memory?
Just an idea.
And a good one. But how should the updater decide which one to use ? Automatically based on cpu power, memory and network ? Configurable by user ? Based on size of package ? ... Klaus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Friday 2007-04-27 at 09:49 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
Perhaps you could add a tunning control (user accesable) to be able to chose deltas, patches or whole rpm depending on the sizes of each and the network bandwidth, and the available memory?
Just an idea.
And a good one.
But how should the updater decide which one to use ?
That's the question! O:-)
Automatically based on cpu power, memory and network ? Configurable by user ? Based on size of package ? ...
Al of them... automatically based on cpu, memory, network, and size of package, plus user configuration. A triffle. I don't know. Perhaps some thing that, based on previous assumptions guestimates how long will it take on each road, and decide. The calculation will depend a lot on each particular machine setup, so it's doubtfull it can be acurately calculated, so perhaps best thing is to base decisions on data from previous sessions. And unless that data is feedback to you, you want be able to initialize the functions properly - but that opens another problem, because people is sensitive to to data gathering. Or from user configuration altogether. A user on an expensive network will probably want deltas all the time, and one on a cheap, big pipe will prefer big packagaes in full. It's not simple to calculate... - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFGMdBAtTMYHG2NR9URAsTEAJ48YodPbkVlD8wZkpQF/F7/mxuVHgCfZ/d0 SbuhiPSWfxGBJ8FQ8LHwdN8= =M63p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
On Friday 27 April 2007 11:28:07 Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Friday 2007-04-27 at 09:49 +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
Automatically based on cpu power, memory and network ? Configurable by user ? Based on size of package ? ...
Al of them... automatically based on cpu, memory, network, and size of package, plus user configuration. A triffle.
I don't know. Perhaps some thing that, based on previous assumptions guestimates how long will it take on each road, and decide. The calculation will depend a lot on each particular machine setup, so it's doubtfull it can be acurately calculated, so perhaps best thing is to base decisions on data from previous sessions. And unless that data is feedback to you, you want be able to initialize the functions properly - but that opens another problem, because people is sensitive to to data gathering.
Or from user configuration altogether.
A user on an expensive network will probably want deltas all the time, and one on a cheap, big pipe will prefer big packagaes in full.
It's not simple to calculate...
Maybe some sort of score for the machine, a la Windows Vista? :) A measure of the system performance and profile based on a set of criteria. This could also be used elsewhere in deciding whether XGL should be enabled etc. Cheers Pete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
participants (14)
-
Alberto Passalacqua -
Carlos E. R. -
Dominique Leuenberger -
Gabriel . -
Gary Ekker -
James Tremblay -
JP Rosevear -
Klaus Kaempf -
Lars Rupp -
M9. -
Marcus Meissner -
Michael Loeffler -
Pete Connolly -
Rajko M.