Hi, I updated some notes this month: ==> libcamera <== random/other: private key signatures of modules /usr/lib64/libcamera-suse.so.3 differs in ELF section .rodata ==> librsb <== = https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1198822 compile-time CPU-detection ==> c3p0 <== = https://github.com/swaldman/c3p0/issues/163 date+time ; ?bug? order issues ; orphaned order issues in /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/c3p0-0.9.5.2.src/build/codegen/com/mchange/v2/c3p0/impl/NewProxyResultSet.java ==> fdo-client <== private keys /usr/share/fdo-client/data/ecdsa256privkey.pem ==> golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter <== => https://github.com/prometheus/promu/pull/230 date+time ; with Witek ==> skaffold <== ? parallelism problem vanished for unknown reason (toolchain fix?) /usr/bin/skaffold differs in assembler output ==> python-numcodecs <== #=> SR 972586 #= https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1198818 CPU/AVX2 ==> python-rpcq <== stuck from -j1 ? ==> libopenraw <== unknown: 8 random bytes in .hash section +++ new /usr/lib64/libopenraw.so.9.0.1 (objdump) @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ ==> calibre <== CPU-dependent from Qt5 QImage scaler /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/mimetypes/text-lrs.png ==> salt <== => https://github.com/openSUSE/salt-packaging/pull/57 last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/H... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-03/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220428/ today https://rb.zq1.de/spec/glossar.txt explains the meaning of below values: total-packages: 14371 (+19) build-tried: 14362 (+22) build-failed: 28 (+5) build-n-a: 169 (-2) build-succeeded: 14166 (+20) build-official-failed+na: 73 (-8) build-compare-failed: 508 (+13) build-compare-succeeded: 13658 (+7) verify-failed: 477 (+38) verified-semi-reproducible: 12761 (-423) bit-by-bit-identical: 13402 (+7) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 772 (+12) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 764 (+13) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220428/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220428/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 62 were in ring1 That makes it 65/3339 => 1.95 % which is below the overall average of 508/14166 => 3.59 % 772/14166 => 5.45 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Ciao Bernhard M.