Hi, this month, I had to spend more time outside of reproducible builds but I still managed to make a few nice patches and bug-reports. We had 2 toolchain issues affecting many packages. https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197484 was already fixed but https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197780 is still open last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/Y... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-02/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220331/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14352 (-19) build-tried: 14340 (-14) build-failed: 23 (-5) build-n-a: 171 (-2) build-succeeded: 14146 (-7) build-official-failed+na: 81 (-10) build-compare-failed: 495 (+87) build-compare-succeeded: 13651 (-94) verify-failed: 439 (-14) verified-semi-reproducible: 13184 (-80) bit-by-bit-identical: 13395 (-249) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 760 (+240) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 751 (+242) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220331/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20220331/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 56 were in ring1 That makes it 59/3339 => 1.77 % which is below the overall average of 495/14146 => 3.50 % 760/14146 => 5.37 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Ciao Bernhard M.