Re: [opensuse-factory] Comparing chronyd and systemd-timesyncd memory ussage [Was: ntpd stop script hanging since conversion to systemd unit]
On 21/11/2018 16:38, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Liam Proven <lproven@suse.cz> [11-21-18 09:53]:
On 21/11/2018 14:10, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
It would of course be highly embarassing if a stupid sntp client like systemd-timesyncd really uses more memory than a full fledged ntp server implementation like chronyd. Judging from other systemd experiences, I would not be surprised, though.
I'm glad you added that last sentence. It would not surprise me in the least.
And I don't think that the systemd team would be in the least bit embarrassed by it, either...
please consider that most contributors are donating their efforts and time. the pointed derogatory statement about the systemd team is unwarranted and unnecessary and out of character for this forum.
Damn, my reply was meant to be offlist. :-( Sorry... -- Liam Proven - Technical Writer, SUSE Linux s.r.o. Corso II, Křižíkova 148/34, 186-00 Praha 8 - Karlín, Czechia Email: lproven@suse.com - Office telephone: +420 284 241 084 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (1)
-
Liam Proven