14 Jun
2019
14 Jun
'19
8:13 a.m.
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages
will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3
months without any feedback from the maintainers.
If there is a package in the list which you feel strongly for, please
speak up && (find a maintainer || take maintainership)
The packages will now enter the removal process. Of course, the package
can be re-added at any time in the future if the problems associated to
it are being settled.
The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory)
* python-veusz
* idutils
+ global (depends on idutilS)
* openlmi-providers
+ openlmi-networking
* pam_passwdqc
* lbzip2
* dc3dd
* crosstool-ng
* python3-efl
+ econnman
+ epymc
+ lekha
* perf
* hedgewars
The ones marked as + FOO are packages depending on the one it's listed
under. They would possibly not fail on their own)
Cheers
Dominique
11:36 a.m.
On 6/14/19 6:40 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 14. 06. 19, 15:13, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
wrote:
Why did automated emails that it was not building cease in March?
According to the bug you opened, two were sent, the last was sent on March 11th.
Fixing now.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
* perf
Perf??? Let me be the maintainer...
request 709990
thanks,
11:40 a.m.
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 09:36 -0700, Tony Jones wrote:
On 6/14/19 6:40 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
2 mails are sent to the maintainer: after 2 weeks of 'build fail' and
'one week later a reminder'.
sending another 15 mails in the hope the maintainer might 'catch one of
them'? or what do you suggest?
for public consumption: the bot is currently being adjusted to send the
mail to the maintainer(s) (as-is) twice (after two and three weeks) -
and then, another week later, send it to opensuse-factory for public
information (1 mail max per day, grouping the packages into one mail).
If nothing comes out of that, the bot will be instructed to file delete
requests on my behalf (often, this DOES wake up people, when nothing
else does)
Cheers,
Dominique
On 14. 06. 19, 15:13, Dominique Leuenberger /
DimStar wrote:
Why did automated emails that it was not building cease in March?
According to the bug you opened, two were sent, the last was sent on March 11th.
Fixing now.
* perf
Perf??? Let me be the maintainer...
request 709990
thanks,
11:55 a.m.
On 6/14/19 9:40 AM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
2 mails are sent to the maintainer: after 2 weeks of
'build fail' and
'one week later a reminder'.
sending another 15 mails in the hope the maintainer might 'catch one of
them'? or what do you suggest
I don't know how I missed the two messages,
perhaps in the jam of SLE work and the endless Jira emails filling my inbox.
So yes, sending more would be a good idea as would cc'ing the maintainer on any such
'package removal notice' emails.
Also you just opened a bugzilla so clearly that is another option.
I thought I was signed up for automatic notification inside the BS for non building
packages.
Jiri, I'll add you as backup maintainer.
Fix submitted.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
17 Jun
17 Jun
3:35 a.m.
On 14. 06. 19, 18:55, Tony Jones wrote:
Jiri, I'll add you as backup maintainer.
Thanks, glad you fixed the problem in the meantime.
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
14 Jun
14 Jun
9:13 a.m.
I'll take a look at hedgewars this weekend. It had an upstream fix for
586 the day after the last update.
Even if I can't fix 586, surely it can stay as x64 works fine?
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 14:14, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
<dimstar(a)opensuse.org> wrote:
Dear hackers and users,
* hedgewars
The ones marked as + FOO are packages depending on the one it's listed
under. They would possibly not fail on their own)
Cheers
Dominique
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
11:37 a.m.
On Freitag, 14. Juni 2019 16:13:40 CEST Jon Brightwell wrote:
I'll take a look at hedgewars this weekend. It had
an upstream fix for
586 the day after the last update.
Even if I can't fix 586, surely it can stay as x64 works fine?
Please have a look at https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710016
Kind regards,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
9:35 a.m.
New subject: [opensuse-factory] Re: Package removal notice
Dear Dominique,
Thanks for the notice. But...
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 15:13 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
wrote:
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following
packages
will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3
months without any feedback from the maintainers.
If there is a package in the list which you feel strongly for, please
speak up && (find a maintainer || take maintainership)
The packages will now enter the removal process. Of course, the
package
can be re-added at any time in the future if the problems associated
to
it are being settled.
The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory)
* python-veusz
...is this because just the i586 builds fail (x86_64 builds just fine)?
I would suggest to simply disable i586 builds at the repository level,
but otherwise I am committed to maintaining this (as I have for a while
now).
Thanks and best wishes.
--
--
Atri Bhattacharya
Fri 14 Jun 16:35:29 CEST 2019
Sent from openSUSE Tumbleweed 20190607 on my laptop.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
9:46 a.m.
New subject: [opensuse-factory] Re: Package removal notice
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 16:35 +0200, badshah400(a)gmail.com wrote:
Dear Dominique,
Thanks for the notice. But...
The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory)
I treat a package as 'failing' for Factory when openSUSE:Factory/$PKG
shows any 'failed' entry.
openSUSE:Factory accepts packages and changes for packages via
submissions - but there are no meta changes to the package (build
enable/disable) - if the package claims to not work in i586, it has to
specify so in the .spec file by means of ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch.
Cheers,
Dominique
* python-veusz
...is this because just the i586 builds fail (x86_64 builds just fine)?
I would suggest to simply disable i586 builds at the repository level,
but otherwise I am committed to maintaining this (as I have for a while
now).
Thanks and best wishes. 
6:04 p.m.
On 14/06/2019 22:43, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages
will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3
months without any feedback from the maintainers.
If there is a package in the list which you feel strongly for, please
speak up && (find a maintainer || take maintainership)
The packages will now enter the removal process. Of course, the package
can be re-added at any time in the future if the problems associated to
it are being settled.
The packages in question are: (all in openSUSE:Factory)
* python3-efl
+ econnman
+ epymc
+ lekha
I guess I missed a submit request, python-efl will replace it as a
single spec version, https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710031 that
will hopefully fix the other deps.
--
Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net
Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek
SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
15 Jun
15 Jun
12:29 p.m.
Greetings.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:13:18 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger /
DimStar <dimstar(a)opensuse.org> wrote:
* lbzip2
This package is failing to build due to breakage in upstream gnulib
(due to glibc 2.28 making incompatible changes). The problem affects
(or affected) not only lbzip2, but many other pieces of software that
depend on gnulib. (For example, it also broke gzip.) This has happened
for many other GNU/Linux distributions besides openSUSE.
Upstream bug reports for lbzip2 and glibc:
https://github.com/kjn/lbzip2/issues/22
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915171
Gnulib has since been fixed. Since it's not distributed as a library,
all packages that depend on it need to have their source code manually
updated.
I have produced an buildable version of the lbzip2 RPM using the
latest version of gnulib and submitted it to the main lbzip2 project:
<https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710118> Hopefully the
maintainer will accept it soon. If not, as a last resort, you could
appoint me to take over the project.
Regards,
Tristan
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tristan Miller
Free Software developer, ferret herder, logologist
https://logological.org/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
17 Jun
17 Jun
2:19 a.m.
Dear Dominique,
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 19:29:02 +0200, Tristan Miller
<psychonaut(a)nothingisreal.com> wrote:
I have produced an buildable version of the lbzip2 RPM
using the
latest version of gnulib and submitted it to the main lbzip2 project:
<https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710118> Hopefully the
maintainer will accept it soon.
The request has been accepted so the official lbzip2 RPM is now
building without errors. I take it this means it can be taken off your
hit-list. :)
Regards,
Tristan
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Tristan Miller
Free Software developer, ferret herder, logologist
https://logological.org/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
3:18 a.m.
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 09:19 +0200, Tristan Miller wrote:
Dear Dominique,
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 19:29:02 +0200, Tristan Miller
<psychonaut(a)nothingisreal.com> wrote:
I have produced an buildable version of the
lbzip2 RPM using the
latest version of gnulib and submitted it to the main lbzip2 project:
<https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/710118> Hopefully the
maintainer will accept it soon.
The request has been accepted so the official lbzip2 RPM is now
building without errors. I take it this means it can be taken off your
hit-list. :) osc rq list openSUSE:Factory libzip2
package
openSUSE:Factory/libzip2 does not exist
Not yet - it's fixed only when it's fixed in openSUSE:Factory. But if
it's already fixed in the devel prj, that is a good step closer.
cheers
Dominique
2:45 a.m.
Am Freitag, 14. Juni 2019, 15:13:18 CEST schrieb Dominique Leuenberger /
DimStar:
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages
will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3
months without any feedback from the maintainers.
* pam_passwdqc
... this one has two maintainers: coolo and you...
Trying to fix that one.
Cheers
MH
--
gpg key fingerprint: 8029 2240 F4DD 7776 E7D2 C042 6B8E 029E 13F2 C102
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
3:16 a.m.
On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 09:45 +0200, Mathias Homann wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. Juni 2019, 15:13:18 CEST schrieb
Dominique Leuenberger /
DimStar:
You are mistaken:
inux-PAM/pam_passwdqc
bugowner of pam_passwdqc :
ckornacker
maintainer of pam_passwdqc :
mcalmer, jengelh
Don't check user roles in openSUSE:Factory - of course me and coolo are
the only 'maintainers' of the distro - but luckily we don't have to
maintain all 12k packages :)
Cheers,
Dominique
Dear hackers and users,
this is a courtesy message to let you know that the following packages
will receive delete requests shortly, as they failed to build for > 3
months without any feedback from the maintainers.
* pam_passwdqc
... this one has two maintainers: coolo and you... 
4:55 a.m.
On Monday 2019-06-17 10:16, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
You are mistaken:
inux-PAM/pam_passwdqc
bugowner of pam_passwdqc :
ckornacker
maintainer of pam_passwdqc :
mcalmer, jengelh
I do not recall signing up for that, so I removed myself there for now.
* pam_passwdqc
Don't check user roles in openSUSE:Factory - of
course me and coolo are
the only 'maintainers' of the distro - but luckily we don't have to
maintain all 12k packages :)
In a way you do. Just ilke I am trying to maintain order in submissions as
a reviewer :-p
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org
624
days inactive
627
days old
17 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
badshah400＠gmail.com -
Brüns, Stefan -
Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar -
Jan Engelhardt -
Jiri Slaby -
Jon Brightwell -
Mathias Homann -
Simon Lees -
Tony Jones -
Tristan Miller