On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> wrote:
Am Dienstag 06 Juli 2010 schrieb Jakub Rusinek:
Then it's your turn to work out another solution ;) .
Oh, I'm fine with 11.3 and 12.0 - it wasn't me who started this storm in a teacup.
After criticizing my invention, Ubuntu's way seems pretty resonable. Year.month.
They don't talk about 2010.4, but about their code names and then label it, so others are not confused. And if you look at ubuntu.com, they have 10.04 not 2010.4 - actually the web page doesn't talk about versions a lot.
How about the release is 11.4 next March and 11.5 in Nov. (or whenever they are). Then in 2012, switch to yy.mm release notation. That way we get to it, but in a way that the release numbers are always increasing. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org