Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2020-09-02 16:08, Per Jessen wrote:
NetworkManager: 2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/64 via fe80::7eff:4dff:fea9:7368 proto ra metric 600 pref medium
2001:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx::/64 proto kernel metric 256 expires 6976sec pref medium
Unless I completely misread those two, although they are different, the end effect should be the same? It is odd to have that extra via on the 2001 route, but does it cause any problems ?
Yes.
- local network 2001:x::/64 - own machine 2001:x::1 - other machine on your LAN 2001:x::2 - ping packet from 2001:x::1 to 2001:x::2 is routed via fe80::7368[router], due to faulty route table entry
Ah, yes of course, duh! FWIW, I've just tried enabling NM on a TW machine, I did not get such an extra via: office25:~ # ip -6 route show dev eth0 2a03:7520:b334:1::/64 dev eth0 proto ra metric 100 pref medium fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 100 pref medium default via fe80::1 dev eth0 proto ra metric 100 pref medium The network has radvd and dhcpv6 (for hostnames only), and it looks like NM chose to enable the privacy settings when it generated the LL address. Which duid does NM use ? -- Per Jessen, Zürich (20.9°C) Member, openSUSE Heroes -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org