On 14.06.2012 13:35, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
On 06/14/2012 01:52 PM, todd rme wrote:
3. As working more strictly will require more time, I would like to either ditch release schedules all together or release only once a year and then rebase Tumbleweed - as already discussed in the RC1 thread. What if we do it the other way around? We have Tumbleweed as the "official" openSUSE version (which is only rebased when SLES is released), and we periodically pull out a version of Tumbleweed and release it as a versioned openSUSE? This version would be frozen with a specific set of package versions, and the release cycle would only involve fixing problems in those versions? That way we avoid the
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Stephan Kulow
wrote: problem of new updates breaking existing fixes during the polishing phase. -Todd Very good idea :)
Please be a bit more verbatim in this thread - I tried to ask very kindly, but let me put it again a bit harsher: please no fan boys in this thread. If you know how factory is developed, if you suffered the problems of running or developing against factory, share your insight. But if you just try to add noise to the thread - DO NOT! Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org