Basil Chupin wrote:
Lukas Ocilka wrote:
OK, so we have better use:
* Different font weight * Different font color * Confirmation if any data-loss is possible
Anything else?
Thx Lukas
Make the wording blink.
Could we, please, stop inviting more and more crazy ideas how to make installation (and particularly Storage) uneasy to use? Let's stop and think about it in a way that is has to be: 1.) Still nice ;) for all 2.) Understandable for all 3.) Easy to read for disabled people There's not need to make red-bold-italic text blink screaming with a warning siren. Even if it would be definitely noticed by color-blind or partially blind people, it could, on the other hand, be 'very disturbing' for epileptic ones. Moreover, even if one feature (e.g., red text) is not useful for people with disabilities (color-blind), it doesn't mean we can't use that feature (not *everybody* is color-blind). There are much easier possibilities: 1.) Proper usage of headers in summaries 2.) Icons 3.) Understandably structured text 4.) Sorting according to importance (important ones first) Example: ------------------------------------------------------ *Partitioning Summary* ====================== [icon w] *Warning: These partitions will be removed* * <red>/dev/sda6</red> [icon w] *Warning: These partitions will be formated* * <red>/dev/sdb4</red> [icon n] *Mount points* * /dev/sda1 mounted as swap * /dev/sdb1 mounted as "/" * /dev/sda2 mounted as "/home" ------------------------------------------------------ Bye Lukas