2010/11/7 Pavol Rusnak firstname.lastname@example.org:
On 07/11/10 13:53, Pavol Rusnak wrote:
On 04/11/10 19:46, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
There are other good reasons to use libjpeg-turbo, namely the 2-4X speed (also battery) improvement.
I can prepare the package, push it to factory, obsolete and remove all existing ones, this is not a problem. Problem is we have to evaluate possible breakages, so I won't do it before I get GREEN from our openSUSE Release Team (coolo atm).
JFYI: I prepared the newest libjpeg-turbo package in home:prusnak repo. The spec is adapted from Fedora Rawhide, but I changed it accordingly to our shared library policy and added (hopefully correct) Obsoletes and Provides.
That "libjpeg62 obsoletes and provides libjpeg8" is probably wrong? Shouldn't it obsolete/provide libjpeg6?