data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8218c/8218c526f29807325e5bb4a79e5af4da307ad8c9" alt=""
On Wed, 27 May 2015 22:18:57 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2015-05-27 21:57, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Carlos E. R. <> [05-27-15 15:37]:
iiuc, this portion of the thread is missing the point. The designation of "42" is a placeholder/temporary-identifying-mark/name-to-use-until-proven or anything it can be called *just* to identify a possible collection of applications until such time as future action can be determined. It doesn't need or have to be "voted" on as it doesn't exist as a distributed version, now or sometime in the future.
If that is so, it is acceptable.
But someone did say here that it was not going to be voted at all, but decided by "the people that do it". That is not acceptable.
So, shall we vote on each package's inclusion in the distro as well? Each version? This is stupid, Carlos. The vote you cite wasn't a membership vote, and it wasn't a binding vote. We vote for the board. We don't vote on a versioning scheme. As Patrick said, I'm done/out here. You want to continue to nitpick and argue about it, find someone else to do it with. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org