data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5106/e51063cd3a2f86dfc12835bfab9c1d8745b2123f" alt=""
josef reidinger wrote:
This looks like missing check for supported scenarios (which if you doesn't have supported scenario write some red warning). And maybe also problem of proposal, which should propose overwrite MBR (also with warning, because rewrite MBR is done automatic if not detected some other bootloader (as windows)) if boot partition is logical.
Why is there a distinction between installing GRUB into an MBR or not? Surely since MBR works in most cases, best, this would be better to have as the default. I think Daniel just said this *is* the case. If this is in fact the case then doesn't the XFS GRUB bug "not exist" anymore in the default proposal? GRUB manages absolutely fine to boot Windows if installed in the MBR, it would be a pretty crap bootloader if it couldn't. How does GRUB operate from the netinstall system (OpenSUSE-11.1-NET.exe on the DVD) and out of curiosity is this the same kind of installation system as Ubuntu/WUBI or just a clever way of booting off a "DVD" without burning one? -- Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com> Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org