On 10/29/2013 3:23 AM, Hubert Mantel wrote:
Das ist ja an �berheblichkeit nicht mehr zu �berbieten. Erst einfach das falsche Protokoll verwenden, dann eine Entschuldigung von denen fordern, die sich an die Protokolle halten und dann sich einfach auf den Standpunkt stellen, dass jeder sich doch einfach zus�tzliche Arbeit machen soll, wenn er mit der selbsternannten Avantgarde kommunizieren m�chte...
Did not understand what I wrote? Hey, get an German -> English translator. They've existed for years. There is no excuse for not learning the language _I_ prefer!!!
If you intermix languages, then you WANT HTML. -- you want mime-typing. HTML is properly tagged as such. Your line noise is interspersed with cleartext and is not tagged. If it was appropriately tagged, (and if I read this on the web), or my email reader had a plugin to autoconvert langs, it wouldn't be a problem. But jointly, with HTML, you get mime-tagging. Something you didn't use. So you inserted binary data into the middle of an english discussion -- it would be like me inserting: H4sIAAtqclIAA02Q3W3DMBCD3zUFBwi8Q4DmvUAnkK2zpVg+FfpxAe8WdKSuUMppi74JIPkd qRdbEErF3cIqvj4fo2QvYwyTXyVUKB8Vm/iMo/3oY5AqOuCWGZSgs508HEFmtrFMXvCaU01r ihG75A9RJ3qhQ7XbBTettLXowtJ0wZ4UdIhiTtlJpte4ICi83Vv19x9R4G3keTR1T+Rp+61h 29xZeKtW3XvTtcKUKsydDUrBXXjiGXLpX/JohfPq0acLrnns8zcqpBUevoBDFIbhjcoJkTgS npU1eqXrbrUulhuwpm1rGo4gmcJGMv9RhmEwMN+EZu74dAEAAA== And sneering at you for not understanding it (it's your paragraph, BTW, zip'ed and mime-encoded). Notice it's SHORTER than your original message! People talk about bloat of HTML -- when they write in "bloated" ascii text rather than a compact format? Bloat is not *necessarily* an excuse (*by itself*). Readability is. Unless I know I am speaking to an audience that understands HTML, I include my message in both formats. I don't assume (as you did) that everyone will understand my formats EVEN if they are will labeled (unlike yours).
Get some dictionary and look up the meaning of "arrogance"!
--- I wasn't the one who started this chain. I was repeating the same tone with the positions reversed. If you don't like the tone that people took toward those who would write in HTML, then direct your anger toward them. I agree their position could easily be called arrogant. But I don't usually bother to label it that every time it is used. When those who start from their privileged positions and don't see the inherent biases and arrogance of such, but go on to accuse others of such, I see it as only fair to point that many of the excuses they use to support their position are very subjective. But when you use foreign characters and don't even label that your sections use such, you are being hypcritical towards those who want to use HTML encoding and characters. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org