Dnia 06-07-2010 o 13:34:25 Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> napisał(a):
Am Dienstag 06 Juli 2010 schrieb Jakub Rusinek:
Dnia 06-07-2010 o 11:12:13 Martin Schlander <martin.schlander@gmail.com>
napisał(a):
Mandag den 5. juli 2010 17:34:35 skrev Jakub Rusinek:
Ubuntu does their numbering job well.
In my experience noone intuitively understands the Ubuntu versioning scheme - it always needs to be explained.
But at least there _is_ a reasonably good explanation for it :-)
Well, nobody says openSUSE should follow their numbering guidelines ;) . Whether they prefer year written as two digits or not, it's their choice. I'd personally vote for eg. 2010.1/2010.2, where the year represents year of the release and number after the point represents number of release that year.
So - 2010.1 would be first release in 2010, 2010.2 would be second, 2011.1 would be first in 2011 etc.
Try to say "KDE 4.4.4 won't be ready for 2010.1, but it's in 2011.1" three times quickly.
Then it's your turn to work out another solution ;) . After criticizing my invention, Ubuntu's way seems pretty resonable. Year.month. -- Best regards, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek http://blog.jakubrusinek.pl/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org