Am 25.09.23 um 08:16 schrieb Chris McGimpsey-Jones | MP Portfolio Management:
I agree with Dave. I use Tumbleweed for my daily and it's rock solid. I don't know where any perception that it's unstable comes from, because it's not the experience I have. I also disliked almost all of the proposed names, but more importantly for me is that I don't see any reason or need for slowroll. Perhaps I'm missing something here but what/who is the target user base for slowroll?
I have not so much time to update tumbleweed weekly (or more often) and checking if all things still work in my production environment. (last update kernel 4.9? brake as example ONLY win xp guests in qemu) so to update in this high frequency tumbleweed makes stress so i think the idea of slowroll is pretty good, IF also packman would be in dync with slowroll. simoN -- www.becherer.de