El miércoles, 25 de noviembre de 2020 10:05:21 (CET) Hans-Peter Jansen escribió:
Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020, 20:25:59 CET schrieb Javier Llorente:
El martes, 24 de noviembre de 2020 19:45:27 (CET) Hans-Peter Jansen
escribió:
Am Dienstag, 24. November 2020, 19:32:58 CET schrieb Javier Llorente:
I have compiled 0.9.3 successfully with "-DBINDINGS=MAINTAINED; -io_glib" Some bindings aren't built due to dependencies not found (next step). Please check SR #850587.
Since quite some packages depend on this, and you moved on into unstable API>
land, you should check them as well, shouldn't you?
Well, isn't Factory about having the latest & greatest? :-P I haven't tested it but yes, it comes with some changes that could break builds.
I have 0.8.26 build mostly fine now. SR #850590.
Excellent. If needed, we could have two packages, one with 0.8.x and another one with 0.9.x.
SR #850668 is down to 5 warnings now.
@Dominique, what about starting with this one. It's looking fine now. @Javier, would you build some of the dependent packages in your branch so see, how this goes? You might want to rebase to my spec (given, Dominique will accept it), since it uses build conditionals now, and has been cleaned from some crude artifacts.
Nice. It's much cleaner now :) I have rebased my spec and was wondering why you aren't building some bindings, such as jna or python. Shouldn't we use %define instead of %bcond_* in this case? I also suggest you adding another section for ruby (it's missing). Cheers, -- Javier Llorente