On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Adrian Schr?ter wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2013, 16:01:23 schrieb
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Sascha Peilicke wrote:
On Monday 02 December 2013 16:17:26 Stephan Kulow
> The fun part about rolling release you can decide yourself when to jump
> on it. There is no reason to update daily.
Quite frankly, I consider this still the best option to have a stable
It's brain-dead simple and may just require a little social interaction:
0) If you are not subscribed to opensuse-factory@ (and probably packaging /
buildservice), you should not run Factory.
1) So check opensuse-factory@ for issues regularly. If there was a mail two
weeks ago about udev (random choice of mine) being heavily broken and no fix
was pushed meanwhile, it may be a good hint to not update today :-)
Coming back from vacation and sick leave I just experience again how
much it sucks to find relevant information in old email threads :-)
Maybe package meta data could be made to carry some kind of good/bad
score. If a certain build of a package is rated down by people, zypper
could display a warning. Maybe the solver could even try to come up with
a solution that does not upgrade to the faulty build.
If we have package metadata amendable by users can we at least record
(open) bugreports there? OTOH bugreports should be eventually visible
to the maintainer so he can do the association as well.
Then you could implement
Argh, that means we need to re-generate the meta data on each change in bugzilla?
You infrastructure murder!
Well, as it's probably not possible to automate this via bugzilla
I'd rather add a
osc addbug prj pkg
but yes, you probably need to re-generate the meta data.
Richard Biener <rguenther(a)suse.de>
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend"orffer
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org