On 03/23/2017 08:33 PM, Michal Kubecek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:15:21PM +0100, Rüdiger
Why don't we use SLE as is?
Actually, we do - most of it. The problem is SLE provides much fewer
packages than openSUSE so that taking SLE as is wouldn't satisfy too
many openSUSE users. The number of packages that exist in both but
openSUSE has newer version is relatively small (higher than I would
I don't believe this. Do you have any numbers? BTW I also count in the
packages which got upgrades since 42.1.
I don't agree that _updating_ a package in Leap
should be any more
difficult than it used to be in pre-Leap era. On the other hand,
_upgrading_ a package between point releases (or even within one) should
be IMHO always carefully thought of and well and clearly reasoned (and
the reason documented).
Well, the term "should be IMHO always carefully thought" has to be
defined more indisputable.
As a reminder this is what Leap wants to be
[...] a level of stability unmatched by other Linux distributions, and
combines that with community developments to give users, developers and
sysadmins the best stable Linux experience available. [...]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner(a)opensuse.org