On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Dr. Werner Fink
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:31:37AM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Dr. Werner Fink
wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Kyrill Detinov
wrote: I've just found that the systemd package includes 369 files (381 already, while writing this message). I'm shocked. openSUSE applied 300+ patches??? Is systemd good and stable for openSUSE? It seems, NO.
I see, every systemd commit to Factory is ~ +10 patches. What's the hell systemd is good for openSUSE? Looking at Fedora? No Fedora way, please. We are openSUSE.
That's openSUSE supporting systemd through patches. Since systemd is in such a horrible state, openSUSE has to fix tons of stuff, and it has. I've seen the improvement in stability at least in my setups. Those patches will eventually be part of systemd, because openSUSE has folks that persevere in trying to convince their developers of the need for them. I think that must be applauded.
Sorry but this is simply not true. Most of the patches *are* part of the current upstream version! You may have a look into the patch collection and read the git headers.
What is not true? (there are many assertions in the quoted paragraph)
Simply to count patches without looking into the patches
systemd> grep -E '^(From|Based on) ' *.patch | wc -l 286
which are 99.9% upstream, including our own upstream submits which afterwards are included as upstream backports. Some of our own patches are adopted but not backported as those would require an version update.
Ok, we're saying the same. "our own" submits do count as non-upstream patches for this purpose (ie: they didn't come from upstream really, the maintainer had to produce them first). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org