-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hi,
last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-06/msg00003.html
Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-05/
This month, several C++ packages became unreproducible from a gcc10 issue https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172846
I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200630/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 13000 (+154) build-tried: 12992 (+155) build-failed: 26 (+13) build-n-a: 120 (-28) build-succeeded: 12846 (+170) build-official-failed+na: 285 (-355) build-compare-failed: 423 (+0) build-compare-succeeded: 12423 (+170) verify-failed: 531 (-4) verified-semi-reproducible: 12096 (+727) verified-bit-identical: 0 (+0) bit-by-bit-identical: 12219 (+133) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 628 (+37) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 627 (+37)
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200630/graph.png shows the change over time
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200630/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)
Of the badly unreproducible packages, 1 were in ring0 40 were in ring1
That makes it 41/2901 => 1.41 % which is below the overall average of 423/12846 => 3.29 %
628/12846 => 4.89 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible
In Ring0, grep can become more reproducible with https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/813322
In Ring1, we have a newly unreproducible package apache-pdfbox from diffs in the javadoc documentation index http://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20200630/apache-pdfbox-compare.out
perf package is still unreproducible from random filesystem readdir order via nftw calls in https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/54ecb8f7028c5eb3d740bb82b0f1d90f2 df63c5c/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c#L1131
Ciao Bernhard M.