On Saturday 2015-05-23 15:36, Richard Brown wrote:
Can you please point me to one example where a software project bumped ~30 version numbers and this turned out to be a success in any way? Version numbers should at least have a continuation (if not other meaning)
Tumbleweed/Factory jumped from 13.1 to 20141104, a jump of 20 million,
That exactly just sucks, because it is on the edge of comparison two different things, even though I reckon that the date _is_ used as version number. A better example would be systemd, which jumped from 44 to 183 because it synced with udev. The version bump was not involved in making systemd/udev a success, and since openSUSE cannot even bring the synchronization argument, that's the result.
The project doesn't make every decision based on democratic votes. We want to encourage the approach of "Those who do, decide", leave the decisions to the people actually putting stuff together for the Project, so I think the decision as to the version number of the next Regular Release should be left to those people who work on the creation of the next Regular Release.
It seems the definition of "working" seems to be limited to those doing OpenQA and ISO building. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org