Hello, On Jul 27 16:30 Richard Brown wrote (excerpt):
In these respects Stable-Devel projects are very similar to Devel projects for the Factory Development Process. In technical terms, they are practically the same and use the same functionality in OBS. Stable-Devel projects are just 'Devel projects for Leap' where as plain Devel Projects are 'Devel projects for Factory'.
I fear that naming may lead to confusion. Up to now there have been only one kind of development projects and therefore they can be called simply "Devel Project". Now there are two kind of development projects. I think they should not be called "Devel Projects" and "Stable-Devel projects" because it will be confusing when nothing has now a meaning (<no_prefix> means "Factory"). I suggest to be explicit to avoid ambiguity and call them "Factory Devel Projects" and "Leap Devel Projects" When using "Devel Project" (without prefix) any kind of development project is meant. This will be even future proof for possible third or fourth kind of development projects. The name "Foo development project" or "Foo devel project" will mean what the output of $ osc develproject openSUSE:Foo <package> is. But there is no (not yet?) openSUSE:Leap. Accordingly it would have to be called "42 devel project". "Leap" == "42" == "Stable-Devel" == <whatelse>? Personally I do not care how it is called. I will (have to) learn the wording whatever it is. I only wonder if it might be confusing for new contributors? Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX GmbH - GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton - HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org