Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/message/... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-08/ I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210930/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14153 (+26) build-tried: 14123 (+25) build-failed: 39 (+14) build-n-a: 292 (+77) build-succeeded: 13792 (-66) build-official-failed+na: 167 (+52) build-compare-failed: 386 (+13) build-compare-succeeded: 13406 (-79) verify-failed: 462 (-7) verified-semi-reproducible: 13194 (+68) bit-by-bit-identical: 13294 (+73) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 500 (-128) not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 498 (-139) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210930/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210930/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 4 were in ring0 38 were in ring1 That makes it 42/3247 => 1.29 % which is below the overall average of 386/13792 => 2.80 % 500/13792 => 3.63 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible I have been busy with other work, so not much progress on openSUSE reproducible builds. Newly unreproducible core packages: * openssl-1_0_0 * librsvg Ciao Bernhard M.