last month's status: https://email@example.com/thread/Z...
Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-04/
This time I spent most time on rebuilding and fixing issues in 15.3 https://rb.zq1.de/leap/15.3/ has some stats.
It was a bit more difficult than 15.2, because older SLE binaries do not get rebuilt, and even Leap is split between Backports and Leap project. I also ran my scripts on https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Step:FrontRunner to check what stops building there and found many issues.
I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210531/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14026 (+71) build-tried: 13989 (+44) build-failed: 58 (-5) build-n-a: 164 (-9) build-succeeded: 13767 (+58) build-official-failed+na: 398 (+136) build-compare-failed: 365 (-1) build-compare-succeeded: 13402 (+59) verify-failed: 468 (-27) verified-semi-reproducible: 12588 (-372) bit-by-bit-identical: 13126 (-65) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 641 (+106)
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210531/graph.png shows the change over time
https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210531/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)
Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 46 were in ring1
That makes it 49/3247 => 1.51 % which is below the overall average of which is below the overall average of 365/13767 => 2.65 %
641/13767 => 4.66 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible
newly unreproducible core packages: kopete is again/still unreproducible from https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-83186
python-pandas suffers from the usual .pyc non-determinism
javassist has filesys-order-related variations in javadoc index-all.html
Ciao Bernhard M.