Wolfgang Rosenauer <wolfgang@rosenauer.org> Wed, 27 May 2015 19:57:38 +0300:
Am 27.05.2015 um 16:56 schrieb Dmitriy Perlow:
Guido Berhoerster <gber@opensuse.org> Wed, 27 May 2015 10:40:34 +0300:
* Robert Schweikert <rjschwei@suse.com> [2015-05-27 00:34]:
On 05/26/2015 06:03 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
Am Dienstag, 26. Mai 2015 schrieb Guido Berhoerster:
Contributors who mainly use and deploy releases and are not be served very well by the outcome of the proposed model may well stop contributing to Factory too.
That could in theory happen.
In practise, you don't want to update your package only every 3 years IMHO [1], so I don't expect there will be many people who submit something only to the SLE-based releases, but not to factory.
It's the other way around. People will still submit to Factory, but may not submit to the openSUSE:42 project as this is no longer automagic when a new release is in the works.
Or do not contribute at all any more because neither Tumbleweed nor the openSUSE-SLE hybrid fits their use-cases any more (which was the point I was trying to make above).
+1. I'll not neither use «openSLE» nor fix runtime issues of my packages for both «openSLE» and openSUSE:Fatory.
An interesting statement since I don't see any real difference between "openSLE" and openSUSE releases as of today. Does that mean that you also do not fix runtime issues of your packages for openSUSE 13.x? And if you do is it just because you use it?
Wolfgang
I maintain all releases and Factory because I am interested in the next release. But if openSMTH is based on outdated SLE not Factory openSMTH will be useless for me because of old default (read as the only at OBS) compiler, X and other things. So what will be the reason to maintain useless releases basing on SLE and useless (since rolling doesn't suite me) Factory? -- Best regards, Dmitriy DA(P).DarkneSS Perlow @ Linux x64 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org