25 Nov
2021
25 Nov
'21
12:01
On 11/25/21 12:43, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2021-11-25 12:40, Michael Ströder wrote:
OpenLDAP 2.6.0+ installs its libldap and liblber like this:
/usr/lib64/libldap.so.2.0.200 /usr/lib64/liblber.so.2.0.200
Following the policy in [1] (and advice of an upstream dev) it seems to be the right approach to call the library package now 'libldap2'. Is this correct? But what about all the dependencies on package 'libldap'?
The policy in [1] states that it's based on SONAME, not filename (most of the time). It even talks about readelf.
Could you please elaborate? $ readelf -d /usr/lib64/libldap.so.2.0.200 [..] Library soname: [libldap.so.2] [..] This means what for the naming? Ciao, Michael.