>In order not to do again the mistakes made with the zen
>update and 10.1, I think we should have _two_ feature freeze
>dates...
>
>One for the _new things_ (patterns, Xorg 7...) and one for
>the _new releases_ of already used things (Kde, Gnome)
>
>I think the latter are already tested by they developpers
>when the first seems already in a very early stage.
>
>I'm disquieted by the "most annoying bugs" list and the _may
>be_ delayed Alpha 3.
>
>I personnally think that a stable distribution is better
.than the very most up to date one.

Hi,

 

I was also very concerned when I saw the 'most annoying bugs' list today (as I epxected Alpha 3).

The worst that can happen to openSUSE is having (again) a release with bugs like the updater in 10.1. Even though they are fixed now, it's still around and poeple installing without an internet connection most obviosuly run into it.

 

If the schedule for 10.2 should be kept like this (which I think it should) then we should try to put bugs away instead of adding last-minute-features and packages. Some might be solved with new packages, some might not.

 

Dominique