On Wed, Sep 30, Stephan Kulow wrote:
That's not an answer to Ancor's question though. That systems change and people that want to administrate need to be willing to learn is not the point here. The question is: what's so bad about having a simple format to configure and learn about?
Nothing, as long as it fullfills your needs.
I.e. what are the actual benefits of going away? Because it's old? That's not an argument you can convince people with in my opinion.
With "it's old" only you are right. But "simple format" could be one ;) E.g. Product Management is requesting since years the feature, that you can take a snapshot across partition and filesystem boundaries and that you can do a rollback to it. Seems like ZFS is able to do so. Several people looked at this. In the end, for the rollback support, everybody stumbled about /etc/fstab not able to provide what's needed. I think with systemd mount units, this would be possible. This would be for me a very good argument for systemd mount units against /etc/fstab. But no, I'm not working on that and I don't request to replace /etc/fstab because of this. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & MicroOS SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany Managing Director: Felix Imendoerffer (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org