24 Apr
2017
24 Apr
'17
18:52
Robert Munteanu wrote:
What is the reason for not moving to 15 as an internal version number, e.g. in the RPM macros and using 43.x in version numbers that are communicated to end users?
Just to be consistent. Well, Leap 42.x was a fault and this corrects it. Personally I appreciate going with 15.x.
As a packager, I need to be up to date with various RPM building techniques, macros and best practices, one more is not going to make a lot of difference.
Well, many openSUSE project members are complaining that there's a lack of contributors. You might be familiar with all of the above. But this whole RPM macro set is black magic for occasional contributors. Adding more does demotivates anyone who wants to give a helping hand. Ciao, Michael.