Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 21:52 +0300, Kyrill Detinov a écrit :
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:01:24 +0200 Richard Brown wrote:
So, why the Source Family? 1. It's designed by Adobe, and they know a thing or two about fonts 2. The fonts are all open source (SIL Open Font License) 3. Wide language support 4. All designed to be used in *User Interfaces* which, is what we're talking about using it for here 5. Much of the Source family is already used by openSUSE in our official branding ( https://opensuse.github.io/branding-guidelines/ ) and having the user interface reflect that will be a subtle way to subliminally imprint a consistent image of openSUSE on our users 6. The fonts all look great in every situation I've tested them in. They do not require any fancy settings like Subpixel hinting to look excellent 7. Modern, Contemporary looking. 8. Source Code Pro, the monospaced font, is very popular with everyone I know who's asked it 9. I've been testing it as my personal default for over 6 months and had no problems.
If there are any objections to this proposal, please speak up with your reasons below.
I have found, Source Serif Pro doesn't include Cyrillic, Greek and Hebrew glyphs. So, no way…
http://susepaste.org/view/simple/90003413 https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-serif-pro/issues/4
Could you test Noto in that case ? (I've updated the font package with most recent tarball from upstream, you might want to grab the latest version for M17n:fonts project on OBS). (Oh, and we can even have Emoji with Noto, although we haven't yet a package for this specific font ;) -- Frederic Crozat Enterprise Desktop Release Manager SUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org