On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:04:10AM +0200, Juergen Weigert wrote:
Other options I could think of:
- implement the checks as rpmlint, so you get to see them earlier. - silently change spec-files during check-in. - accept the original submission, and send back another sr with a fix to the requester. - ignore the rubbish that we have in the specfiles, and educate our customers, that there is no hope for improvement.
How about: - fix up obvious problems in the packages before requiring changes in the license-bot to be stopping others from checking stuff in? It isn't difficult to fix up 170 different packages and submit the changes if your tool can flag them. It's a pain, yes, but to expect others to do the work for you when you changed the rules is a bit unfair, don't you think? Or, if it's too much of a pain, post the problem packages here, and have others help you in fixing them. 170 packages could easily be divided up and fixed up in a day by a small handful of people. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org