On 28 March 2017 at 18:24, Daniele <kailed@kailed.net> wrote:
Il 28/03/2017 17:23, Fabian Wein ha scritto: ....
Once again, we *don't want* LTS desktop systems, simply for the reason that for our use cases it is good to have newest software. We prefer "newer" instead of "stable and old" for our desktops.
IMHO, the old behavior (pre Leap) was a very good compromise. I miss it..
My understanding is that having only TW and LTS Leap would mean that there is no modern desktop available most of the time.
Isn't TW up-to-date enough?
It is, but in my eyes not necessarily robust enough for general broad productive desktop use.
I agree with you here, almost every week there's something broken/half working or not well tested at least..
The hole between Leap and TW is too big. I'm very worried of what will happen with Leap 43, a big jump in software version will break a lots of things..
Daniele.
The old behaviour was a gap that was much larger than the gap between Leap and TW I find your points contradictory - if you preferred the old behaviour, how could you then worry about the much smaller gap than we now have compared to back then? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org